作者: Bjørn Hofmann , Morten Magelssen
DOI: 10.1186/S12910-018-0299-9
关键词: Philosophy of medicine 、 Excellence 、 Quality (business) 、 Engineering ethics 、 Realm 、 Dialectic 、 Sociology 、 Added value 、 Argumentative 、 Bioethics
摘要: What is good bioethics? Addressing this question key for reinforcing and developing the field. In particular, a discussion of potential quality criteria can heighten awareness contribute to bioethics publications. Accordingly, objective article threefold: first, we want identify set in bioethics. Second, illustrate added value novel method: in-depth analysis single with aim deriving criteria. The third ultimate goal stimulate broad vivid debate on goodness An initial literature search reveals range diverse order expand realm such criteria, perform an that acclaimed being exemplary. results eleven specific three categories: argumentative, empirical, dialectic. Although do not claim identified are universal or absolute, argue they fruitful fueling continuous constitutive what “good bioethics.” Identifying, debating, refining, applying important part defining improving