Reproductive Performance for Four Breeds of Swine: Crossbred Females and Purebred and Crossbred Boars

作者: D. S. Buchanan , R. K. Johnson

DOI: 10.2527/JAS1984.594948X

关键词: Veterinary medicineFeedlotFeed conversion ratioSireBiologyAnimal scienceBreedReproductionHeterosisCrossbreedPurebred

摘要: Purebred and two-breed cross (F1) boars were mated to F1 females produce all possible three- four-breed pigs involving the Duroc, Yorkshire, Landrace Spotted breeds. Individual postweaning average daily gain (ADG), age at 100 kg (AGE) probed backfat thickness (BF) data collected on 3,456 pigs. A total of 213 pens with an 15.58 per pen was evaluated for feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) feed consumption (ADF). Genotype X environment interactions, specifically breed year-season farrowed parity (for ADG), found be highly significant. Certain results, however, reasonably consistent across environments. Duroc-sired grew more efficiently than other sire groups (3.11 vs 3.21 F/G), although there no significant differences in ADF between groups. had less BF three-breed pigs, based upon within dam comparisons, suggesting composition efficient Landrace-sired fatter No real crossbred-sired contemporary pure-bred-sired apparent F/G, ADF, ADG, AGE, or BF. Assuming paternal heterosis zero, these results suggested recombination effects negligible performance traits. Apart from via direct genetic effects, mating crossbred rather purebred different breeding should have little impact feedlot offspring produced.

参考文章(11)
Walter R. Harvey, Mixed Model Capabilities of LSML76 Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 54, pp. 1279- 1285 ,(1982) , 10.2527/JAS1982.5461279X
Daryl L. Kuhlers, Steve B. Jungst, Ronnie L. Edwards, J. A. Little, Comparisons of Specific Crosses from Landrace, Duroc - Landrace and Yorkshire - Landrace Sows Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 53, pp. 40- 48 ,(1981) , 10.2527/JAS1981.53140X
Daryl L. Kuhlers, Steve B. Jungst, Ronnie L. Edwards, J. A. Little, Comparisons of Specific Crosses from Duroc-Landrace, Spot-Landrace and Hampshire-Landrace Sows Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 55, pp. 236- 242 ,(1982) , 10.2527/JAS1982.552236X
L. K. Hutchens, R. L. Hintz, R. K. Johnson, BREED COMPARISONS FOR AGE AND WEIGHT AT PUBERTY IN GILTS Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 55, pp. 60- 66 ,(1982) , 10.2527/JAS1982.55160X
W. B. Holtmann, M. H. Fahmy, T. M. MacIntyre, J. E. Moxley, Evaluation of female reproductive performance of 28 one-way crosses produced from eight breeds of swine Animal Science. ,vol. 21, pp. 199- 207 ,(1975) , 10.1017/S0003356100030658
P. D. CONLON, B. W. KENNEDY, A COMPARISON OF CROSSBRED AND PUREBRED BOARS FOR SEMEN AND REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS Canadian Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 58, pp. 63- 70 ,(1978) , 10.4141/CJAS78-009
W. B. Lishman, W. C. Smith, M. Bichard, R. Thompson, The comparative performance of purebred and crossbred boars in commercial pig production Animal production. ,vol. 21, pp. 69- 75 ,(1975) , 10.1017/S0003356100030427
K. J. Drewry, Sow productivity traits of crossbred sows. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 50, pp. 242- 248 ,(1980) , 10.2527/JAS1980.502242X
J. D. Neely, B. H. Johnson, O. W. Robison, Heterosis Estimates for Measures of Reproductive Traits in Crossbred Boars 1 Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 51, pp. 1070- 1077 ,(1980) , 10.2527/JAS1980.5151070X