作者: Benjamin F. Hobbs , Jeffrey C. Honious , Joel Bluestein
DOI: 10.1016/1040-6190(92)90161-Y
关键词: Cofiring 、 Fossil fuel 、 Fuel gas 、 Decision tree 、 Coal 、 Natural gas 、 Flexibility (engineering) 、 Waste management 、 Energy source 、 Process engineering 、 Computer science
摘要: The purpose of this article is to show how decision trees can be used calculate the flexibility a utility plan, and demonstrate method by quantifying benefits cofiring natural gas. Cofiring burning gas in primary combustion zone continuously or seasonally, as partial replacement for coal. authors summarize cofiring. There they point out that previous analyses, ignoring uncertainty, could not evaluate cofiring's may therefore have understated its attractiveness. They then present simple example illustrates quantified using trees. close summarizing study which estimate midwestern utility. conclude gives system significantly more than flue desulfurization, buying allowances, switching low-sulfur