Why Johnny Can’t Prove

作者: Tommy Dreyfus

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-1584-3_5

关键词: Mathematical proofPsychologyMathematical thinkingMathematics educationSentenceMathematics instruction

摘要: The one sentence answer to the question in title is that ability prove depends on forms of knowledge which most students are rarely if ever exposed. paper gives a more detailed analysis, drawing research mathematics education and classroom experiences.

参考文章(33)
Augustin-Louis Cauchy, COURS D'ANALYSE DE L'ÉCOLE ROYALE POLYTECHNIQUE Oeuvres complètes. pp. 17- 30 ,(2009) , 10.1017/CBO9780511702525.003
Daniel Alibert, Michael Thomas, Research on Mathematical Proof Advanced Mathematical Thinking. pp. 215- 230 ,(2002) , 10.1007/0-306-47203-1_13
Nitsa Movshovitz-Hadar, Stimulating Presentation of Theorems Followed by Responsive Proofs. for the learning of mathematics. ,vol. 8, pp. 12- ,(1988)
Tommy Dreyfus, Nurit Hadas, Proof as Answer to the Question Why. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik/International Reviews on Mathematical Education. ,vol. 28, pp. 1- 5 ,(1996)
Robert J Sternberg, Talia Ben-Zeev, None, The Nature of Mathematical Thinking Routledge. ,(2012) , 10.4324/9780203053270
David Orme Tall, Advanced Mathematical Thinking ,(1994)
Shlomo Vinner, The Pseudo-Conceptual and the Pseudo-Analytical Thought Processes in Mathematics Learning Educational Studies in Mathematics. ,vol. 34, pp. 97- 129 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1002998529016
John Mason, Mary Spence, Beyond Mere Knowledge of Mathematics: The Importance of Knowing-to Act in the Moment Educational Studies in Mathematics. ,vol. 38, pp. 135- 161 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1003622804002
John B. Fraleigh, Calculus with Analytic Geometry ,(1980)