Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis.

作者: Hanne Dagfinrud , Kåre Birger Hagen , Tore K Kvien

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002822.PUB3

关键词: BalneotherapySpondylitisCINAHLPsychological interventionPhysical therapyAmbulatory careAnkylosing spondylitisPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMeta-analysisMEDLINEMedicine

摘要: Background Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic, inflammatory rheumatic disease. Physiotherapy considered an important part of the overall management AS. Objectives To summarise available scientific evidence on effectiveness physiotherapy interventions in AS. Search methods We searched Cochrane Central Register Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL and PEDro up to January 2007 for all relevant publications, without any language restrictions. We checked reference lists articles contacted authors included articles. Selection criteria We randomised quasi-randomised studies with AS patients where at least one comparison groups received physiotherapy. The main outcomes interest were pain, stiffness, spinal mobility, physical function patient global assessment. Data collection analysis Two reviewers independently selected trials inclusion, extracted data assessed trial quality. Investigators obtain missing information. Main results Eleven total 763 participants this updated review. Four compared individualised home exercise programs or supervised program no intervention reported low quality effects mobility (Relative percentage differences (RPDs) from 5-50%) (four points 33-point scale). Three group home-exercise moderate small (RPDs 7.5-18%) assessment (1.46 cm) favour exercises. In study, three-week inpatient spa-exercise therapy followed by 37 weeks weekly outpatient (without spa) was alone; there pain (18%), (24%) (27%) combined therapy. One study daily balneotherapy only program, another fresh water None these showed significant between-group differences. experimental conventional program; statistically change scores nearly measures program. Authors' conclusions The results review suggest that individual home-based better than intervention; exercises; alone.

参考文章(64)
C. Bakker, S. Van Der Linden, E. Van Doorslaer, A. Hidding, Cost effectiveness of group physical therapy compared to individualized therapy for ankylosing spondylitis. A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 21, pp. 264- 268 ,(1994)
A Helewa, C Goldsmith, B Stokes, G Kraag, J Groh, The effects of comprehensive home physiotherapy and supervision on patients with ankylosing spondylitis--a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 17, pp. 228- 233 ,(1990)
Kauppi M, Kautiainen H, Heikkilä S, Viitanen Jv, Sensitivity to change of mobility tests; effect of short term intensive physiotherapy and exercise on spinal, hip, and shoulder measurements in spondyloarthropathy. The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 27, pp. 1251- 1256 ,(2000)
Jens Ole Rasmussen, Troels Mørk Hansen, Physical training for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. ,vol. 2, pp. 25- 27 ,(1989) , 10.1002/ANR.1790020107
Ingvild Kjeken, Tore K Kvien, Hanne Dagfinrud, Petter Mowinckel, Kaare B Hagen, Impact of functional impairment in ankylosing spondylitis: impairment, activity limitation, and participation restrictions. The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 32, pp. 516- 523 ,(2005)
Siobhan Sweeney, Gordon Taylor, Andrei Calin, The effect of a home based exercise intervention package on outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 29, pp. 763- 766 ,(2002)
S Brophy, A Calin, H Santos, Exercise in ankylosing spondylitis: how much is optimum? The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 25, pp. 2156- 2160 ,(1998)
Sjef Van Der Linden, Hans A. Valkenburg, Arnold Cats, Evaluation of Diagnostic Criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis Arthritis & Rheumatism. ,vol. 27, pp. 361- 368 ,(1984) , 10.1002/ART.1780270401
A. Hidding, S. Van der Linden, L. De Witte, Therapeutic effects of individual physical therapy in ankylosing spondylitis related to duration of disease. Clinical Rheumatology. ,vol. 12, pp. 334- 340 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF02231574