Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation in North Carolina: An Evaluation of Regulatory Success

作者: Tammy Hill , Eric Kulz , Breda Munoz , John R. Dorney

DOI: 10.1007/S00267-013-0027-7

关键词: EcosystemSTREAMSWetlandEnvironmental resource managementStream restorationForest managementEnvironmental scienceNature ConservationHigh rateConstructed wetland

摘要: Data from a probability sample were used to estimate wetland and stream mitigation success 2007 2009 across North Carolina (NC). “Success” was defined as whether the site met regulatory requirements in place at time of construction. Analytical results weighted by both component counts size. Overall (including preservation) estimated 74 % (SE = 3 %) for wetlands 75 % (SE = 4 %) streams NC. Compared previous studies, rates had increased since mid-1990s. Differences between providers (mitigation banks, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program’s design-bid-build full-delivery programs, Department Transportation private permittee-responsible mitigation) generally not significant although yielded higher certain circumstances. Both preservation showed high enhancement rate significantly than that restoration. Additional statistically differences when size considered included: (1) Piedmont lower other areas state, (2) recently constructed projects demonstrated those built prior 2002. Opportunities improvement exist record-keeping, understanding relationship post-construction establishment long-term ecological trajectories restoration projects, incorporation numeric metrics into monitoring criteria, adaptation designs achieve greater Piedmont.

参考文章(20)
Christopher Eric Pfeifer, Edward J. Kaiser, An Evaluation of Wetlands Permitting and Mitigation Practices in North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina. ,(1995)
Melvin J. Dubnick, Army Corps of Engineers ,(1998)
Melissa M. Hornyak, Kathleen E. Halvorsen, Wetland mitigation compliance in the Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan Environmental Management. ,vol. 32, pp. 535- 540 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S00267-003-2851-7
Jeffrey W. Matthews, Anton G. Endress, Performance Criteria, Compliance Success, and Vegetation Development in Compensatory Mitigation Wetlands Environmental Management. ,vol. 41, pp. 130- 141 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S00267-007-9002-5
MARK F. SUDOL, RICHARD F. AMBROSE, The US clean water act and habitat replacement: Evaluation of mitigation sites in Orange County, California, USA Environmental Management. ,vol. 30, pp. 727- 734 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00267-002-2787-3
Aaron O. Allen, Johannes J. Feddema, Wetland loss and substitution by the section 404 permit program in southern California, USA. Environmental Management. ,vol. 20, pp. 263- 274 ,(1996) , 10.1007/BF01204011
Charles Andrew Cole, Deborah Shafer, Section 404 Wetland Mitigation and Permit Success Criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986–1999 Environmental Management. ,vol. 30, pp. 508- 515 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00267-002-2717-4
Leslie L. Orzetti, R. Christian Jones, Robert F. Murphy, STREAM CONDITION IN PIEDMONT STREAMS WITH RESTORED RIPARIAN BUFFERS IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED Journal of The American Water Resources Association. ,vol. 46, pp. 473- 485 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1752-1688.2009.00414.X
Chad I. Kettlewell, Virginie Bouchard, Deni Porej, Mick Micacchion, John J. Mack, Dale White, Laura Fay, AN ASSESSMENT OF WETLAND IMPACTS AND COMPENSATORY MITIGATION IN THE CUYAHOGA RIVER WATERSHED, OHIO, USA Wetlands. ,vol. 28, pp. 57- 67 ,(2008) , 10.1672/07-01.1