Nowhere to hide: pumas, black bears, and competition refuges

作者: L. M. Elbroch , P. E. Lendrum , M. L. Allen , H. U. Wittmer

DOI: 10.1093/BEHECO/ARU189

关键词: Competition (biology)BiologyForagingOptimal foraging theoryApex predatorEcologyAmerican black bearUrsusKleptoparasitismPredation

摘要: One hypothesis for how carnivores with overlapping ecology coexist in natural systems is through heterogeneous competition landscapes, which subordinates utilize “competition refuges” to mitigate risks associated dominant competitors. We tested the effects of American black bear (Ursus americanus) kleptoparasitism on puma (Puma concolor) foraging 2 North America. also whether partial prey consumption exhibited by pumas presence bears was better explained rules optimal or bears, and utilized spatial refuges over carcass remains. Puma kill rates ungulates/wk were equivalent across study systems, but 48% greater season than no-bear season. Our analyses handling time did not support notion that followed patterns foraging. Rather, bears. Surprisingly, instead our results suggested they increase their compensate losses. linking high seasonal a top predator competitor provide strong evidence predation can only be understood within community framework. In particular, we propose future studies should differentiate between relative contributions predators competitors dynamics. Further, suggest kleptoparasites may indirectly impact populations predators.

参考文章(39)
Abishek Harihar, Bivash Pandav, Surendra P. Goyal, Responses of leopard Panthera pardus to the recovery of a tiger Panthera tigris population Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 48, pp. 806- 814 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2011.01981.X
MARK ELBROCH, TUYENI H. MWAMPAMBA, MARIA J. SANTOS, MAXINE ZYLBERBERG, LOUIS LIEBENBERG, JAMES MINYE, CHRISTOPHER MOSSER, ERIN REDDY, The value, limitations, and challenges of employing local experts in conservation research. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 25, pp. 1195- 1202 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2011.01740.X
John A. Vucetich, Leah M. Vucetich, Rolf O. Peterson, The causes and consequences of partial prey consumption by wolves preying on moose Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 66, pp. 295- 303 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00265-011-1277-0
L. Mark Elbroch, Maximilian L. Allen, Blake H. Lowrey, Heiko U. Wittmer, The difference between killing and eating: ecological shortcomings of puma energetic models Ecosphere. ,vol. 5, pp. 1- 16 ,(2014) , 10.1890/ES13-00373.1
Robert Macarthur, Richard Levins, The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species The American Naturalist. ,vol. 101, pp. 377- 385 ,(1967) , 10.1086/282505
Jeffrey R. Lucas, Alan Grafen, Partial prey consumption by ambush predators Journal of Theoretical Biology. ,vol. 113, pp. 455- 473 ,(1985) , 10.1016/S0022-5193(85)80033-3
Bryan F. J. Manly, Lyman L. McDonald, Dana L. Thomas, Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical design and analysis for field studies ,(2011)
Fred S. Guthery, Kenneth P. Burnham, David R. Anderson, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach The Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 67, pp. 655- ,(2003) , 10.2307/3802723
Abi Tamim Vanak, Daniel Fortin, Maria Thaker, Monika Ogden, Cailey Owen, Sophie Greatwood, Rob Slotow, Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores. Ecology. ,vol. 94, pp. 2619- 2631 ,(2013) , 10.1890/13-0217.1
Chris Carbone, John L. Gittleman, A Common Rule for the Scaling of Carnivore Density Science. ,vol. 295, pp. 2273- 2276 ,(2002) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1067994