Perspectives on the Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation

作者: Mark W. Schwartz , Kristy Deiner , Tavis Forrester , Patrick Grof-Tisza , Matthew J. Muir

DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2012.06.014

关键词: Project managementGeneral partnershipAdaptive managementVariety (cybernetics)Computer scienceConservation psychologyCommunity of practiceEnvironmental resource managementProcess managementSpatial planningOpen standard

摘要: The Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation (OS), and its software platform Miradi, are becoming central tools conservation management. There is, however, very little literature on either after 5 years widespread implementation. We applied OS, using to five widely varied projects as foundation this perspective. find, in general, that OS logical, clear, provide a robust hierarchical structure from which organize management action track progress toward project goals. One goal Measures Partnership creating is foster community practice conservation. To better accomplish this, we recommend working toward: (1) library case studies illustrate tension between flexibility management; (2) broadening definitions targets threats accommodate variety projects; (3) developing critical linkages complementary (e.g., structured decision-making, spatial planning tools); (4) clearly distinguishing rankings prioritization given expert opinion versus testing hypotheses gain mechanistic understanding cause effect; (5) rapid assessment discern when should invest cost fully plan OS. call both academics practitioners engage with one another benefit training, cross-project learning action.

参考文章(41)
James A. Dubovsky, William L. Kendall, Fred A. Johnson, Conditions and Limitations on Learning in the Adaptive Management of Mallard Harvests Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 30, pp. 176- 185 ,(2002)
A.J. Atkinson, P.C. Trenham, R.N. Fisher, S.A. Hathaway, B.S. Johnson, S.G. Torres, Y.C. Moore, Designing monitoring programs in an adaptive management context for regional multiple species conservation plans Technical Report. pp. 0- 69 ,(2004) , 10.3133/2002233
Etienne C. Wenger, William M. Snyder, Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier Harvard Business Review. ,vol. 78, pp. 139- 145 ,(2000)
Michael C. Runge, Sarah J. Converse, James E. Lyons, Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program Biological Conservation. ,vol. 144, pp. 1214- 1223 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2010.12.020
Eve McDonald-Madden, Peter W.J. Baxter, Hugh P. Possingham, Making robust decisions for conservation with restricted money and knowledge Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 45, pp. 1630- 1638 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2008.01553.X
Andrew S. Pullin, Teri M. Knight, Doing more good than harm: building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Biological Conservation. ,vol. 142, pp. 931- 934 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2009.01.010
Heather Tallis, Phillip S. Levin, Mary Ruckelshaus, Sarah E. Lester, Karen L. McLeod, David L. Fluharty, Benjamin S. Halpern, The many faces of ecosystem-based management: Making the process work today in real places Marine Policy. ,vol. 34, pp. 340- 348 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2009.08.003
John Seely Brown, Paul Duguid, Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective Organization Science. ,vol. 12, pp. 198- 213 ,(2001) , 10.1287/ORSC.12.2.198.10116