Value Added in Regional Climate Modeling: Should One Aim to Improve on the Large Scales as Well?

作者: Fedor Mesinger , Katarina Veljovic , Michael J. Fennessy , Eric L. Altshuler

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0973-1_15

关键词: DownscalingClimate modelValue (mathematics)Flood mythPredictabilityOrder (exchange)GeographyMeteorologyHindcastNumerical weather prediction

摘要: Expectations various regional climate modelers have expressed as to the impact on large scales are recalled. While some authors do mention possibility of improvement also at (e.g., Giorgi, J Phys IV France 139:101–118, 2006), majority clearly accepts view “downscaling” an effort in which driver global model hoped be preserved much possible and only small improved compared those model. Many find it even desirable use so-called “large-scale nudging” order help achieve this objective. Mesinger et al. (Limited area predictability: can “upscaling” take place? Research activities atmospheric oceanic modeling, WMO, Geneva, CAS/JSC WGNE Rep. No. 32, 5.30-5.31, 2002; see Mesinger, The Eta model: design, history, performance, what lessons we learned? In: Symposium 50th anniversary operational numerical weather prediction, University Maryland, College Park, MD, 14–17 June 2004, Preprints CD-ROM, 20pp, 2004) however argued that NWP results NCEP strongly suggest improvements been taking place more often than not. In addition, there was a four-month nine-member ensemble result Fennessy Altshuler early 2000s, published recently (Veljovic Meteorol Z 19:237–246, 2010), RCM achieved dramatic over its AGCM hindcasting precipitation difference central United States between “flood year” 1993 “drought 1988; not believe could without significant scales. If indeed is so generalized, then large-scale nudging would unnecessary but may harmful result. It holds for models while others. case, why question obvious importance. Given claims made modeling impossible any models, hard evidence specific desirable. preceding additional points discussed well detail given, summarizing perhaps first comprehensive direct tests issue 2010). Additional shown regarding choice lateral boundary conditions (LBC) scheme, pointing advantage (Mesinger, Contrib Atmos 50:200–210, 1977) conventional costlier relaxation scheme. As posed, summarized show driving by ECMWF 32-day members tended not, giving support our tenet improving efforts possible. We furthermore argue pursuing objective should beneficial smaller well.

参考文章(35)
René Laprise, Dragana Kornic, Maja Rapaić, Leo Šeparović, Martin Leduc, Oumarou Nikiema, Alejandro Di Luca, Emilia Diaconescu, Adelina Alexandru, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Ramón de Elía, Daniel Caya, Sébastien Biner, Considerations of Domain Size and Large-Scale Driving for Nested Regional Climate Models: Impact on Internal Variability and Ability at Developing Small-Scale Details Climate Change. pp. 181- 199 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-3-7091-0973-1_14
Filippo Giorgi, Linda O. Mearns, Christine Shields, Larry McDaniel, Regional Nested Model Simulations of Present Day and 2 × CO2 Climate over the Central Plains of the U.S. Climatic Change. ,vol. 40, pp. 457- 493 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1005384803949
André Berger, Fedor Mesinger, Djordje Sijacki, None, Climate Change.Inferences from paleoclimate and regional aspects ,(2012)
Jeff Chun-Fung Lo, Zong-Liang Yang, Roger A. Pielke, Assessment of three dynamical climate downscaling methods using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 113, ,(2008) , 10.1029/2007JD009216
Emilia Paula Diaconescu, René Laprise, Laxmi Sushama, The impact of lateral boundary data errors on the simulated climate of a nested regional climate model Climate Dynamics. ,vol. 28, pp. 333- 350 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S00382-006-0189-6
R. Laprise, R. de Elía, D. Caya, S. Biner, P. Lucas-Picher, E. Diaconescu, M. Leduc, A. Alexandru, L. Separovic, , Challenging some tenets of Regional Climate Modelling Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics. ,vol. 100, pp. 3- 22 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S00703-008-0292-9
Denis B., Laprise R., Caya D., Côté J., Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models: the Big-Brother Experiment Climate Dynamics. ,vol. 18, pp. 627- 646 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00382-001-0201-0
F. Giorgi, Regional climate modeling: Status and perspectives Journal De Physique Iv. ,vol. 139, pp. 101- 118 ,(2006) , 10.1051/JP4:2006139008