Numerical Simulation of Turbid-Density Current Using v2 – f Turbulence Model

作者: A. Mehdizadeh , B. Firoozabadi , B. Farhanieh

DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2005-80263

关键词: Reynolds decompositionMeteorologyTurbulenceTurbulence modelingK-epsilon turbulence modelReynolds stress equation modelMechanicsReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equationsK-omega turbulence modelPhysicsReynolds number

摘要: The deposition behavior of fine sediment is an important phenomenon, and yet unclear to engineers concerned about reservoir sedimentation. An elliptic relaxation turbulence model (v2 – f model) has been used to simulate the motion of turbid density currents laden whit fine solid particles. During the last few years, the v2 – f turbulence model has become increasingly popular due to its ability to account for near-wall damping without use of damping functions. In addition, it has been proved that the v2 – f model to be superior to other RANS methods in many fluid flows where complex flow features are present. Due to low Reynolds number turbulence of turbidity current, (its critical Reynolds no. is about 1000), the κ - ε model, which was standardized for high Reynolds number and isotropic turbulence flow, cannot simulate the anisotropy and non-homogenous behavior near wall. In this study, turbidity current with uniform velocity and concentration enters the channel via a sluice gate into a lighter ambient fluid and moves forward down-slope. The model has been verified with experimental data sets. Moreover, results have been compared with the standard κ - ε turbulent model. Results show that the κ - ε model has the poor result on this current. In addition, results show that the coarse particles settle down rapidly and make the higher deposition rate. The deposition of particles and the effects of their fall velocity on concentration distribution, height of body, and entrainment coefficient are also investigated.

参考文章(32)
S. Parneix, P.A. Durbin, M. Behnia, Computation of 3-D turbulent boundary layers using the V2F model Flow Turbulence and Combustion. ,vol. 60, pp. 19- 46 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1009986925097
P. A. Durbin, Near-wall turbulence closure modeling without ``damping functions'' Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics. ,vol. 3, pp. 1- 13 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF00271513
A. Sveningsson, L. Davidson, Assessment of realizability constraints in v2–f turbulence models International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. ,vol. 25, pp. 785- 794 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.IJHEATFLUIDFLOW.2004.05.014
Michael W. Stacey, Anthony J. Bowen, The vertical structure of density and turbidity currents: Theory and observations Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 93, pp. 3528- 3542 ,(1988) , 10.1029/JC093IC04P03528
J. Akiyama, H. Stefan, Turbidity Current with Erosion and Deposition Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ,vol. 111, pp. 1473- 1496 ,(1985) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1985)111:12(1473)
Djamel Lakehal, Peter Krebs, Johan Krijgsman, Wolfgang Rodi, Computing Shear Flow and Sludge Blanket in Secondary Clarifiers Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ,vol. 125, pp. 253- 262 ,(1999) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:3(253)
K. Hermanson, S. Kern, G. Picker, S. Parneix, Predictions of External Heat Transfer for Turbine Vanes and Blades With Secondary Flowfields Journal of Turbomachinery-transactions of The Asme. ,vol. 125, pp. 107- 113 ,(2003) , 10.1115/1.1529201
Nian-Sheng Cheng, Effect of Concentration on Settling Velocity of Sediment Particles Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ,vol. 123, pp. 728- 731 ,(1997) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:8(728)
Fue-Sang Lien, Georgi Kalitzin, None, Computations of transonic flow with the v2–f turbulence model International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. ,vol. 22, pp. 53- 61 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0142-727X(00)00073-4
Vahid Alavian, Behavior of Density Currents on an Incline Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ,vol. 112, pp. 27- 42 ,(1986) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:1(27)