The determinants of direct corporate lobbying in the EU: A multi-dimensional proxy of corporate lobbying

作者: Matia Vannoni

DOI: 10.1057/IGA.2012.16

关键词: Political strategyAsset specificityEmpirical researchEuropean unionContext (language use)LawPolitical communicationArgumentSociologyAsset (economics)Positive economics

摘要: This article argues for a more thorough analysis of the dynamics corporate lobbying within European Union (EU). Although there is broad consensus among scholars on emergence new type lobbying, studies have not sufficiently addressed underlying economic rationale. Indeed, many authors emphasise shift towards system based direct lobbying; however, these concentre only systemic and non-economic causes. Direct are perceived mainly in two ways: either as consequence conscious political strategy institutions response to ‘interest overload’ mid-1990s or normal phase development interest group populations. Advocating an economics-based analytical approach this contribution debate provides one very first attempts uncover influence factors by building seminal work proposed Bernhagen Mitchell. These authors, familiar with American tradition studies, were apply ‘standard model behaviour’ context examining various determinants lobbying. goes further: it analyses empirical database constructed Mitchell, multi-dimensional proxy main study its analysis, namely, operationalisation dependent variable ‘direct lobbying’. It proposes multi-strategy/multi-venue aiming overcome pitfalls that characterise dichotomous uni-dimensional operational definitions, order answer research question: ‘What EU?’ Such has required unpacking some elements taken granted discussion researcher needs take into consideration strategies their relative weights (that is, multi-strategy operationalisation). For example, accreditation EP equal establishment company representation office Brussels. Furthermore, another possible level action firm's strategy, industry one, should also be considered multi-venue operationalisation): analysed preference over other approaches rather than absolute terms. The findings show how such expanded casts light First all, Olsonian argument finds support: concentration determines strategies. Second, asset mobility/specificity influences lobby directly vis-a-vis venues.

参考文章(28)
Holger Bonin, Werner Eichhorst, Christer Florman, Mette Okkels Hansen, Lena Skiold, Jan Stuhler, Konstantinos Tatsiramos, Henrik Thomasen, Klaus Zimmermann, Geographic Mobility in the European Union: Optimising its Economic and Social Benefits IZA Research Reports. ,(2008)
David Coen, J. J. Richardson, Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors, and Issues Oxford University Press (2009). ,(2009)
National Bureau of Economic Research Con, Jagdish Bhagwati, National Bureau of Economic Research Conference on Import Competition and Adjustment: Theory and Policy (1980 : Cambridge, Mass.), Import Competition and Response Research Papers in Economics. ,(1982) , 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226045405.001.0001
R. Kenneth Godwin, Edward J. Lopez, Barry J. Seldon, Allocating Lobbying Resources between Collective and Private Rents Political Research Quarterly. ,vol. 61, pp. 345- 359 ,(2008) , 10.1177/1065912907307290
Jan Beyers, Bart Kerremans, Critical resource dependencies and the Europeanization of domestic interest groups Journal of European Public Policy. ,vol. 14, pp. 460- 481 ,(2007) , 10.1080/13501760701243822
David Lowery, Virginia Gray, A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests Political Research Quarterly. ,vol. 57, pp. 163- 175 ,(2004) , 10.1177/106591290405700114
Taiji Furusawa, Edwin L.-C. Lai, Adjustment costs and gradual trade liberalization Journal of International Economics. ,vol. 49, pp. 333- 361 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00071-3