(ANT)agonistics: Pluralistic politicization of, and by, accounting and its technologies

作者: Eija Vinnari , Jesse Dillard

DOI: 10.1016/J.CPA.2016.02.001

关键词: Corporate governancePoliticsEthosActor–network theoryDialogicAccountingDemocracySociologyIntegrated reportingContext (language use)Information Systems and ManagementFinanceSociology and Political Science

摘要: Abstract Agonistics has been put forth as a theoretical/conceptual basis for developing more democratic forms of accounting, such dialogic accounting. However, an area agonistics based accounting that requires further theorization is “the moment decision”—how the discussion and debate can maintain its pluralistic ethos while being focused in way to ultimately lead choosing implementing action. In richer agonistic we engage actor–network theory, particularly due process envisioned Bruno Latour’s Politics Nature (2004a). doing so, contribute critical literature focusing on by introducing bicameral parliament refining Brown’s principles. As secondary contribution, our (ANT)agonistic framework responds calls governance context We illustrate theoretical with example regarding development integrated reporting.

参考文章(80)
Thomas Christiano, The rule of the many ,(1996)
Ian Thomson, Jan Bebbington, Social and environmental reporting in the UK: a pedagogic evaluation Critical Perspectives on Accounting. ,vol. 16, pp. 507- 533 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.CPA.2003.06.003
Chantal Mouffe, On the political ,(2005)
Jesse Dillard, Judy Brown, Taking Pluralism Seriously Within an Ethic of Accountability Springer Netherlands. pp. 75- 90 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-94-007-7082-9_4
M. Contrafatto, I. Thomson, E.A. Monk, Peru, mountains and los niños: Dialogic action, accounting and sustainable transformation Critical Perspectives on Accounting. ,vol. 33, pp. 117- 136 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.CPA.2015.04.009