Intersecting Social Science and Conservation

作者: Julia Jung , Thomas Sanborn

DOI: 10.3389/FMARS.2021.676394

关键词: Environmental degradationInclusion (disability rights)Social scienceContext (language use)MainstreamingMarine conservationParticipatory managementEquity (finance)Political scienceEcosystem services

摘要: There is a growing consensus that current conservation strategies are unable to cope with the acceleration of human-caused environmental degradation. The philosophies underpin and shape traditional initiatives have begun shift towards "people nature" approach, based on new deeper understanding relational values. With this shift, there increasing concern about social impacts need consider not only aspects conservation, but also issues equity justice. This especially important for marine avoid repeating exclusionary unjust protective measures sometimes seen in terrestrial conservation. Additionally, lack compliance management schemes, failure dimensions realities local communities hindered success initiatives. Therefore, engagement science better human-wildlife human-nature connections necessary. Community-based approaches payment ecosystem service schemes can provide insights lessons such improved participatory management. Furthermore, use offers range methods be used improve consideration those dimensions. These include different theoretical frameworks relationships between people, society, nature, innovative more flexible, adaptive systems-based complex socio-ecological systems. Increasing mainstreaming inclusion will depend overcoming institutional barriers as capacity, time, funding opportunities context science.

参考文章(98)
Luis Outeiro, Claudio Gajardo, Hugo Oyarzo, Francisco Ther, Patricio Cornejo, Sebastian Villasante, Leticia Bas Ventine, Framing local ecological knowledge to value marine ecosystem services for the customary sea tenure of aboriginal communities in southern Chile Ecosystem services. ,vol. 16, pp. 354- 364 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ECOSER.2015.04.004
G. CUNDILL, G. S. CUMMING, D. BIGGS, C. FABRICIUS, Soft Systems Thinking and Social Learning for Adaptive Management Conservation Biology. ,vol. 26, pp. 13- 20 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2011.01755.X
KERRY A. WAYLEN, ANKE FISCHER, PHILIP J. K. MCGOWAN, SIMON J. THIRGOOD, E. J. MILNER-GULLAND, Effect of Local Cultural Context on the Success of Community‐Based Conservation Interventions Conservation Biology. ,vol. 24, pp. 1119- 1129 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2010.01446.X
DAN BROCKINGTON, JIM IGOE, KAI SCHMIDT-SOLTAU, Conservation, human rights, and poverty reduction. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 20, pp. 250- 252 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2006.00335.X
P. WESLEY SCHULTZ, Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 25, pp. 1080- 1083 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2011.01766.X
Richard Worrell, Michael C. Appleby, Stewardship of Natural Resources: Definition, Ethical and Practical Aspects Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics. ,vol. 12, pp. 263- 277 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1009534214698
Joshua Cinner, Cindy Huchery, A Comparison of Social Outcomes Associated with Different Fisheries Co-Management Institutions Conservation Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 224- 232 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CONL.12057
KATIE MOON, DEBORAH BLACKMAN, A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 28, pp. 1167- 1177 ,(2014) , 10.1111/COBI.12326
Lisa Boonzaier, Daniel Pauly, Marine protection targets: an updated assessment of global progress Oryx. ,vol. 50, pp. 27- 35 ,(2016) , 10.1017/S0030605315000848
Ken Vance-Borland, June Holley, Conservation stakeholder network mapping, analysis, and weaving Conservation Letters. ,vol. 4, pp. 278- 288 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2011.00176.X