Professionalism for future humanistic doctors

作者: Sedigheh Ebrahimi

DOI:

关键词: DignityAutonomyEthical dilemmaSocial skillsBeneficencePatient satisfactionMedicineMedical educationPersonal relationshipSocial learning

摘要: Dear editor Clinical environments encounter is an important part of studying medicine (1). Patient contact as integral medical education occurs in various formats the clinical settings (2, 3). During training, students may experience high levels stress, and some not deal with it well. The abruptness students’ transition to setting generated positive negative emotions. Due being a novice, they did receive adequate training on how get emotionally prepared for meeting seriously ill people. In such circumstances, shortage will have predictably crucial consequences. Early has been suggested reduce these stresses help adapt effectively changes hospital climate (2). creates environment where each student appreciates cultural diversity reinforces development professional interpersonal skills through social, emotional cognitive experiences (4, 5). It encourages validating relationship between patients doctors allows more personal nurture ability empathize them, providing considerable benefits trainees patients. this way, social emotions that when empathizing patient represent uniquely human achievement. By internalizing their  subjective interpretations patient’s beliefs feelings, student’s body, brain mind come together produce cognition emotion . They construct culturally relevant knowledge make decisions about act think problems if were their own. On other hand, interaction undergraduate offers valuable early insight into day-to-day role doctor patients’ perspective specific conditions. provides greater roles responsibilities (6- 8). Considering contributing educational process exposure students, note schools bear responsibility framework approach way. necessary programs begin provide formalised preparation ethical challenges working settings. While large bulk feedback from showed generally attitude toward participation, there still be risk adverse effect teaching environment. Thus, should adequately informed permission obtained involvement. Previous studies indicated often face dilemmas concerning patient-care.  A study conducted by Walters et al. (2003) reported therapeutic benefits, common mental disorders general practice .The revealed satisfaction; however, small number found distressing (9). Teaching hospitals need become safe sacred place respect rights dignity (10). There are numerous involvement unintended consequences loss privacy missing responses. An ethically sensitive organization faces probe having balance duty well doing best care main point dilemma beneficence versus non- malfeasance (harm) Ethical sensitivity can promoted guidelines proposed patient-oriented hospitals.The principles guide all practices central any at stages education. Patients express concerns over breaching considerations including consent confidentiality. Lack related could impact learning outcomes (11). With increased focus autonomy, principle also ignored no freedom choice given visited trainees. Therefore, essential right activity which he or she contribute, must (12). authority choosing whether observe participate during visit reassured so affect receive. who particularly dependent level information thus extent situation asked If treating team good rapport assured she  harmed embarrassed  activity, most them would cooperate contribute willingly (13). shared maintain confidentiality (1).                                                            In conclusion, program opportunities develop behavior. communicate wishes needs expected doctors. For promoting education, sufficient weight ethical, professional, attitudinal, features practice. treatment affective modern considered scientific foundations medicine.

参考文章(14)
Javad Kojuri, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Sedigheh Ebrahimi, Early Clinical Experience: A Way for Preparing Students for Clinical Setting Galen Medical Journal. ,vol. 1, pp. 42- 47 ,(2012)
KR Sethuraman, Ethics of patient care by trainee-doctors in teaching hospitals. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. ,vol. 49, pp. 159- 162 ,(2003)
Reshma Jagsi, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, The ethics of medical education BMJ. ,vol. 329, pp. 332- 334 ,(2004) , 10.1136/BMJ.329.7461.332
Sonia Littlewood, Valmae Ypinazar, Stephen A Margolis, Albert Scherpbier, John Spencer, Tim Dornan, Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: systematic review BMJ. ,vol. 331, pp. 387- 391 ,(2005) , 10.1136/BMJ.331.7513.387
John Spencer, Patients in medical education The Lancet. ,vol. 363, pp. 1480- 1480 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16124-2
John Spencer, David Blackmore, Sam Heard, Peter McCrorie, David McHaffie, Albert Scherpbier, Tarun Sen Gupta, Kuldip Singh, Lesley Southgate, Patient-oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students Medical Education. ,vol. 34, pp. 851- 857 ,(2000) , 10.1046/J.1365-2923.2000.00779.X
Amanda Howe, Valerie Dagley, Kevork Hopayian, Mark Lillicrap, Patient contact in the first year of basic medical training—Feasible, educational, acceptable? Medical Teacher. ,vol. 29, pp. 237- 245 ,(2007) , 10.1080/01421590701294356