Outcome of Repeated Hysteroscopic Resection of the Endometrium
作者： Bent Brandt Hansen , Eva Dreisler , Søren Stampe Sørensen
DOI: 10.1016/J.JMIG.2008.08.003
关键词: University teaching 、 Perioperative 、 Medicine 、 Retrospective cohort study 、 Surgery 、 Endometrium 、 Hysteroscopic resection 、 Task force 、 Endometrial resection 、 Hysterectomy
摘要: Abstract Study Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated endometrial resection. Design Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting University teaching hospital. Patients Women with a failed primary Intervention Repeated resection, roller-ball coagulation, or both. Measurements Main Results In all, 65 women had resection during period from January 1995 through December 2002. Data were collected standardized data sheets, hospital records, National Patient Registry Board Health. The outcome measurement was subsequent hysterectomy, secondary, perioperative complications. median follow-up time 56 months (range 40–110 months). 28 (43%) required hysterectomy eventually. Six (9%) operative Conclusion Repeat is relatively safe, minimally invasive operation approximately 60% operated on will avoid hysterectomy. should be performed by an experienced hysteroscopic surgeon.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(19)
Jan Utzon, Bent Ottesen, Henrik Kehlet, Charlotte Møller, Hysterectomy in Denmark. An analysis of postoperative hospitalisation, morbidity and readmission. Danish Medical Bulletin. ,vol. 49, pp. 353- 357 ,(2002)
R J Gimpelson, J Kaigh, Endometrial ablation repeat procedures : case studies Journal of Reproductive Medicine. ,vol. 37, pp. 629- 635 ,(1992)
Erin MacLean-Fraser, Deborah Penava, George A. Vilos, Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary and Repeat Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablations Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. ,vol. 9, pp. 175- 177 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60127-2
Ingeborg Bøe Engelsen, Kathrine Woie, Knut Hordnes, Transcervical endometrial resection: Long‐term results of 390 procedures Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 85, pp. 82- 87 ,(2006) , 10.1080/00016340500424314
Hugh O'Connor, Adam Magos, Endometrial Resection for the Treatment of Menorrhagia The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 335, pp. 151- 156 ,(1996) , 10.1056/NEJM199607183350302
V Boujida, Five-year follow-up of endometrial ablation: endometrial coagulation versus endometrial resection Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 99, pp. 988- 992 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)01954-3
Pietro Litta, Federica Merlin, Chiara Pozzan, Giovanni Battista Nardelli, Giampiero Capobianco, Salvatore Dessole, Antonio Ambrosini, Transcervical endometrial resection in women with menorrhagia: long-term follow-up. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. ,vol. 125, pp. 99- 102 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2005.07.017
Tirso Pérez-Medina, Javier Haya, Luis San Frutos, José Bajo Arenas, Factors influencing long-term outcome of loop endometrial resection. Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. ,vol. 9, pp. 272- 276 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60403-3
Morris Wortman, Amy Daggett, Reoperative hysteroscopic surgery in the management of patients who fail endometrial ablation and resection. Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. ,vol. 8, pp. 272- 277 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60590-7
P. Martyn, B. Allan, Long-term follow-up of endometrial ablation. Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. ,vol. 5, pp. 115- 118 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S1074-3804(98)80075-3