Adoption barriers and resistance to sustainable solutions in the automotive sector

作者: Klaus-Peter Wiedmann , Nadine Hennigs , Lars Pankalla , Martin Kassubek , Barbara Seegebarth

DOI: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2011.06.023

关键词: Sustainable energyNatural gas vehicleRisk perceptionSustainable solutionsContext (language use)MarketingIndustrial organizationResistance (psychoanalysis)Automotive industryBusinessAlternative fuels

摘要: Abstract Development of alternative fuels and engines in the automotive sector is a requirement for building sustainable energy policy. However, private consumers' acceptance technological alternatives to internal combustion still minimal. This study has two objectives. Based on theoretical empirical findings, this examines risk-related adoption barriers their impact upon innovation resistance solutions sector. In next step, cluster analysis leads various groups drivers with reference risk dimensions as perceived by consumers context possible purchase an NGV. The paper concludes research managerial implications opportunities address overcome individual consumer's resistance.

参考文章(32)
Leon B. Kaplan, Jacob Jacoby, The Components of Perceived Risk ACR Special Volumes. ,(1972)
Didier Swysen, Bruno De Borger, Christophe Courcelle, Optimal Pricing of Transport Externalities in a Federal System Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. ,vol. 37, pp. 69- 94 ,(2003)
Thomas F Golob, David S Bunch, David Brownstone, A VEHICLE USE FORECASTING MODEL BASED ON REVEALED AND STATED VEHICLE TYPE CHOICE AND UTILISATION DATA. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. ,(1997)
Frank Hyneman Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit ,(1921)
Harry Horace Harman, Modern factor analysis ,(1960)
Utpal M. Dholakia, A motivational process model of product involvement and consumer risk perception European Journal of Marketing. ,vol. 35, pp. 1340- 1362 ,(2001) , 10.1108/EUM0000000006479
Annika M Nordlund, Jörgen Garvill, Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use Journal of Environmental Psychology. ,vol. 23, pp. 339- 347 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00037-9