Effect of Nitrogen Rate and Stubble Height on Dry Matter Yield, Crude Protein Content and Crude Protein Yield of a Sorghum–Sudangrass Hybrid[Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench × Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf.] in the Three‐Cutting System

作者: S. Iptas , A. R. Brohi

DOI: 10.1046/J.1439-037X.2003.00001.X

关键词: CuttingYield (chemistry)PoaceaeSorghumPlant breedingDry matterPlant proteinCropping systemMathematicsAgronomy

摘要: In this study, the effects of nitrogen (N) rate (60, 120, 180 and 240 kg N ha−1 applied in three equal dressings at seeding after first second cuttings) stubble height (7, 14 21 cm) on dry matter (DM) yield, crude protein (CP) content, CP yield a sorghum–sudangrass hybrid [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench × Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf., cv. Pioneer 988] three-cut system was investigated. The N had no significant effect third cuttings, but cutting DM yields increased significantly with increase rate. highest 9.1 t ha−1 obtained 80 kg N ha−1 for average 2 years cutting, difference found among 40, 60 rates. content were not affected by application cutting. Stubble However, it cuttings.

参考文章(15)
D. W. Nelson, L. E. Sommers, Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3—Chemical Methods. pp. 961- 1010 ,(1996) , 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.3.C34
Ethan C. Holt, George D. Alston, Response of Sudangrass Hybrids to Cutting Practices1 Agronomy Journal. ,vol. 60, pp. 303- 306 ,(1968) , 10.2134/AGRONJ1968.00021962006000030017X
James E. Beuerlein, Henry A. Fribourg, Frank F. Bell, Effects of Environment and Cutting on the Regrowth of a Sorghum‐Sudangrass Hybrid1 Crop Science. ,vol. 8, pp. 152- 155 ,(1968) , 10.2135/CROPSCI1968.0011183X000800020003X
Y. Shehu, W. S. Alhassan, U. R. Pal, C. J. C. Phillips, The effect of intercropping Lablab purpureus L. with sorghum on yield and chemical composition of fodder Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. ,vol. 183, pp. 73- 79 ,(1999) , 10.1046/J.1439-037X.1999.00338.X
A. T Wiancko, F. S. Harris, S. C. Salmon, Report of the Committee on Standardization of Field Experiments Agronomy Journal. ,vol. 10, pp. 345- 354 ,(1918) , 10.2134/AGRONJ1918.00021962001000090010X