Decreased delivery and acute toxicity of cranial irradiation and chemotherapy given with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in a rodent model: the issue of sequence.

作者: Edward A. Neuwelt , Laura G. Remsen , Gary Sexton , Harper D. Pearse , Raymond Garcia

DOI:

关键词: Radiation therapyChemotherapyMedicineCarboplatinMethotrexateAntifolateToxicityAnesthesiaEtoposideAntimetabolite

摘要: The sequence of chemotherapy administered prior to cranial irradiation rather than the more traditional order radiation followed by is currently being evaluated. This rodent study was designed assess sequencing therapy and with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). Drug delivery acute toxicity were Two clinically relevant regimens given BBBD: intraarterial methotrexate (MTX, 1 g/m2), or a combination carboplatin (200 mg/m2) i.v. etoposide mg/m2). In randomized protocol, standard model 2000 cGy as single fraction using parallel opposed portals 30 days to, concurrent (24 h prior), after these two chemotherapeutic regimens. A total 72 animals evaluated in this study. administration external beam either high molecular weight marker 14C-labeled dextran 70 (Mr 70,000), low 3H-labeled MTX 456) resulted statistically significant (P < 0.01) decrease drug when compared not receiving irradiation. Seizures observed 26% that received BBBD. It did matter whether radiotherapy MTX. seen any other group. mortality significantly = 0.03) higher control BBBD, but no radiation. decreased radiotherapy; BBBD an increased incidence seizures, there increase With regard toxicity, may have advantages over sequences utilizing

参考文章(46)
Arnold Herskovic, Karen Martz, Muhyi Al-Sarraf, Lawrence Leichman, Jeffrey Brindle, Vainutis Vaitkevicius, Jay Cooper, Roger Byhardt, Lawrence Davis, Bahman Emami, Combined Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Compared with Radiotherapy Alone in Patients with Cancer of the Esophagus The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 326, pp. 1593- 1598 ,(1992) , 10.1056/NEJM199206113262403
Patricia K. Duffner, Marc E. Horowitz, Jeffrey P. Krischer, Henry S. Friedman, Peter C. Burger, Michael E. Cohen, Robert A. Sanford, Raymond K. Mulhern, Hector E. James, Carolyn R. Freeman, F. Glen Seidel, Larry E. Kun, Postoperative Chemotherapy and Delayed Radiation in Children Less Than Three Years of Age With Malignant Brain Tumors The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 328, pp. 1725- 1731 ,(1993) , 10.1056/NEJM199306173282401
William R. Shapiro, Dean F. Young, Bipin M. Mehta, Methotrexate: Distribution in Cerebrospinal Fluid after Intravenous, Ventricular and Lumbar Injections New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 293, pp. 161- 166 ,(1975) , 10.1056/NEJM197507242930402
Edward A. Neuwelt, Peggy A. Barnett, Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in the Treatment of Brain Tumors: Animal Studies Springer US. pp. 107- 193 ,(1989) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-7255-8_4
Peter Mahler, Brian Griffin, J. Russell Geyer, W. Archie Bleyer, Chemoradiotherapy Interactions and the Blood-Brain Barrier Springer US. pp. 373- 387 ,(1989) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-7255-8_9
Nigel H. Greig, Brain Tumors and the Blood-Tumor Barrier Springer US. pp. 77- 106 ,(1989) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-7255-8_3
Guy Storme, Wim Distelmans, Wilfried De Neve, Marcus Mareel, Antitumor Drug Radiation Interactions ,(1990)
Edward A. Neuwelt, Peggy A. Barnett, Christopher I. McCormick, I. Hellström, Paul Beaumier, K. E. Hellström, Ronald M. Weigel, Delivery of Melanoma-associated Immunoglobulin Monoclonal Antibody and Fab Fragments to Normal Brain Utilizing Osmotic Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Cancer Research. ,vol. 48, pp. 4725- 4729 ,(1988)
E A Neuwelt, D L Goldman, S A Dahlborg, J Crossen, F Ramsey, S Roman-Goldstein, R Braziel, B Dana, Primary CNS lymphoma treated with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption: prolonged survival and preservation of cognitive function. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 9, pp. 1580- 1590 ,(1991) , 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.9.1580