Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography

作者: Mark B. Williams , Priya Raghunathan , Mitali J. More , J. Anthony Seibert , Alexander Kwan

DOI: 10.1118/1.2912177

关键词: Biomedical engineeringMammographyImaging phantomAutomatic exposure controlMathematicsDigital mammographyNuclear medicineEnvironmental exposureRadiographic Image EnhancementImage processingSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)

摘要: Optimization of exposure parameters (target, filter, and kVp) in digital mammography necessitates maximization the image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), while simultaneously minimizing patient dose. The goal this study is to compare, for each major commercially available full field (FFDM) systems, impact selection technique factors on SNR radiation dose a range breast thickness tissue types. This phantom an update previous investigation includes measurements recent versions two FFDM systems discussed that article, as well three not at time. five commercial tested, Senographe 2000D from GE Healthcare, Mammomat Novation DR Siemens, Selenia Hologic, Fischer Senoscan, Fuji’s 5000MA used with Lorad M-IV unit, are located different university test sites. Performance was assessed using all x-ray target filter combinations nine types (three compressed thicknesses composition types). Each type also imaged automatic control (AEC) system identify under automated acquisition. figure merit (FOM) compare square mean glandular results show that, given target∕filter combination, general FOM slowly changing function kVp, stronger dependence choice combination. In cases decreasing kVp top settings, indicating higher tube voltages would produce no further performance improvement. For type, parameter set resulting highest value specific, depending both combinations, receptor type. most cases, AECs successfully identified values near maximum ones, however, there were several examples where AEC could be improved.

参考文章(12)
Mark B. Williams, Priya Raghunathan, Anthony Seibert, Alex Kwan, Joseph Lo, Ehsan Samei, Laurie Fajardo, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Martin Yaffe, Aili Bloomquist, Beam optimization for digital mammography – II international conference on digital mammography. pp. 273- 280 ,(2006) , 10.1007/11783237_38
John M. Boone, Gary S. Shaber, Melvin Tecotzky, Dual-energy mammography: A detector analysis Medical Physics. ,vol. 17, pp. 665- 675 ,(1990) , 10.1118/1.596548
Robert J. Jennings, P. W. Quinn, Robert M. Gagne, Thomas R. Fewell, Evaluation of x-ray sources for mammography Medical Imaging 1993: Physics of Medical Imaging. ,vol. 1896, pp. 259- 268 ,(1993) , 10.1117/12.154597
Elodia B. Cole, Etta D. Pisano, Emily O. Kistner, Keith E. Muller, Marylee E. Brown, Stephen A. Feig, Roberta A. Jong, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Melinda J. Staiger, Cherie M. Kuzmiak, Rita I. Freimanis, Nadine Lesko, Eric L. Rosen, Ruth Walsh, Margaret Williford, M. Patricia Braeuning, Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology. ,vol. 226, pp. 153- 160 ,(2003) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2261012024
Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Hans Roehrig, William Dallas, Jiahua Fan, Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers. Journal of Digital Imaging. ,vol. 18, pp. 311- 315 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S10278-005-7666-Z
Wlad T. Sobol, Xizeng Wu, Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables. Medical Physics. ,vol. 24, pp. 547- 554 ,(1997) , 10.1118/1.597937
Walter Huda, Anthony M. Sajewicz, Kent M. Ogden, David R. Dance, Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. Medical Physics. ,vol. 30, pp. 442- 448 ,(2003) , 10.1118/1.1543572
L Stanton, T Villafana, J L Day, D A Lightfoot, Dosage evaluation in mammography Radiology. ,vol. 150, pp. 577- 584 ,(1984) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.150.2.6691119
Philipp Bernhardt, Thomas Mertelmeier, Martin Hoheisel, X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. Medical Physics. ,vol. 33, pp. 4337- 4349 ,(2006) , 10.1118/1.2351951
Elizabeth A Krupinski, Jeffrey Johnson, Hans Roehrig, Michael Engstrom, Jiahua Fan, John Nafziger, Jeffrey Lubin, William J Dallas, Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation Academic Radiology. ,vol. 10, pp. 1030- 1035 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00293-9