Uncertainty propagation in urban hydrology water quality modelling
作者： G.B.M. Heuvelink , Arturo Torres Matallana , U. Leopold
DOI:
关键词: Hydrology 、 Water quality modelling 、 Uncertainty analysis 、 Uncertainty quantification 、 Drainage 、 Combined sewer 、 Propagation of uncertainty 、 Environmental science 、 Sensitivity analysis 、 Dimensioning
摘要: Uncertainty is often ignored in urban hydrology modelling. Engineering practice typically ignores uncertainties and uncertainty propagation. This can have large impacts, such as the wrong dimensioning of drainage systems inaccurate estimation pollution environment caused by combined sewer overflows. paper presents an propagation analysis The case study was Haute-Sure catchment Luxembourg for one yearly time series measured 2010, 10 individual rainfall events 2011. selection model input variables quantification based on their level sensitivity. Probability distribution functions were defined to represent variables. We applied a Monte Carlo technique using simplified model, EmiStatR, which simulates volume substance flows systems. focus loads concentrations chemical oxygen demand ammonium, are important wastewater surface water quality management.
narcis.nl参考文章(12)
Marc Benjamin Neumann, Uncertainty analysis for performance evaluation and design of urban water infrastructure ETH. ,(2007) , 10.3929/ETHZ-A-005386170
G. B. M. Heuvelink, J. D. Brown, E. E. van Loon, A probabilistic framework for representing and simulating uncertain environmental variables International Journal of Geographical Information Science. ,vol. 21, pp. 497- 513 ,(2007) , 10.1080/13658810601063951
James D Brown, Knowledge, uncertainty and physical geography: towards the development of methodologies for questioning belief Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. ,vol. 29, pp. 367- 381 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.0020-2754.2004.00342.X
Budiman Minasny, Alex B. McBratney, A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information Computers & Geosciences. ,vol. 32, pp. 1378- 1388 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.CAGEO.2005.12.009
P. van der Keur, H. J. Henriksen, J. C. Refsgaard, M. Brugnach, C. Pahl-Wostl, A. Dewulf, H. Buiteveld, Identification of Major Sources of Uncertainty in Current IWRM Practice. Illustrated for the Rhine Basin Water Resources Management. ,vol. 22, pp. 1677- 1708 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11269-008-9248-6
Christopher Zoppou, Review of urban storm water models Environmental Modelling and Software. ,vol. 16, pp. 195- 231 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00084-0
J.E. Nash, J.V. Sutcliffe, River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ Journal of Hydrology. ,vol. 10, pp. 282- 290 ,(1970) , 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
R. J. Beckman, M. D. McKay, W. J. Conover, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code Technometrics. ,vol. 42, pp. 55- 61 ,(2000) , 10.2307/1271432
L. Nol, G.B.M. Heuvelink, A. Veldkamp, W. de Vries, J. Kros, Uncertainty propagation analysis of an N2O emission model at the plot and landscape scale. Geoderma. ,vol. 159, pp. 9- 23 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2010.06.009
A. Deletic, C.B.S. Dotto, D.T. McCarthy, M. Kleidorfer, G. Freni, G. Mannina, M. Uhl, M. Henrichs, T.D. Fletcher, W. Rauch, J.L. Bertrand-Krajewski, S. Tait, Assessing uncertainties in urban drainage models Physics and Chemistry of The Earth. ,vol. 42, pp. 3- 10 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.PCE.2011.04.007