Bargaining and argument-based negotiation: some preliminary comparisons

摘要: Argumentation-based techniques are being increasingly used to construct frameworks for flexible negotiation among computational agents. Despite the advancements made date, relationship between argument-based and bargaining has been rather informal. This paper presents a preliminary investigation into understanding this relationship. To end, we present set of concepts through which analyse both argumentation-based methods. We demonstrate that if agents have false beliefs, then they may make decisions during lead them suboptimal deals. describe different ways in communication can cause changes an agent’s beliefs and, consequently, its preferences over contracts. enables us how approach improve likelihood quality