Breast lesion detection and characterization with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Prospective randomized intraindividual comparison of gadoterate meglumine (0.15 mmol/kg) and gadobenate dimeglumine (0.075 mmol/kg) at 3T.

作者: Paola Clauser , Thomas H. Helbich , Panagiotis Kapetas , Katja Pinker , Maria Bernathova

DOI: 10.1002/JMRI.26335

关键词: PopulationCrossover studyNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingProspective cohort studyGadoliniumStage (cooking)Breast cancerHistopathologyMedicine

摘要: Background Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) of the breast is highly sensitive for cancer detection. Multichannel coils and 3T scanners can increase signal, spatial, temporal resolution. In addition, T1 -reduction effect a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) higher at 3T. Thus, it might be possible to reduce dose GBCA without losing diagnostic information. Purpose To compare three-quarter (0.075 mmol/kg) high-relaxivity gadobenate dimeglumine, with 1.5-fold than on-label (0.15 gadoterate meglumine lesion detection characterization CE-MRI. Study type Prospective, randomized, intraindividual comparative study. Population Eligible were patients abnormalities (BI-RADS 0, 4, 5) on conventional imaging. Each patient underwent two examinations, 24-72 hours apart, one 0.075 mmol/kg other 0.15 administered in randomized order. all, 109 prospectively recruited. Field strength/sequence MRI standard protocol (dynamic-CE, T2 w-TSE, STIR-T2 w, DWI). Assessment Histopathology was reference. Three blinded, off-site radiologists evaluated examinations using BI-RADS lexicon. Statistical tests Lesion detection, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy calculated per-lesion per-region, compared by univariate multivariate analysis (Generalized Estimating Equations, GEE). Results Five excluded, leaving 104 women 142 histologically verified lesions (109 malignant, 33 benign) available evaluation. (84.5-88.7%) not inferior (84.5-90.8%) (P ≥ 0.165). At per-region analysis, demonstrated specificity (96.4-98.7% vs. 92.6-97.3%, P ≤ 0.007) (96.3-97.8% 93.6-96.1%, 0.001) gadoterate. Multivariate superior, reader-independent (odds ratio = 1.7, Data conclusion A Gadobenate allowed increased accuracy. Level evidence 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1157-1165.

参考文章(30)
Pamela K. Woodard, Thomas L. Chenevert, H. Dirk Sostman, Kathleen A. Jablonski, Paul D. Stein, Lawrence R. Goodman, Frank J. Londy, Vamsidhar Narra, Charles A. Hales, Russell D. Hull, Victor F. Tapson, John G. Weg, Signal quality of single dose gadobenate dimeglumine pulmonary MRA examinations exceeds quality of MRA performed with double dose gadopentetate dimeglumine The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. ,vol. 28, pp. 295- 301 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10554-011-9821-6
Katia Khouri Chalouhi, Giacomo D.E. Papini, Michele Bandirali, Luca M. Sconfienza, Giovanni Di Leo, Francesco Sardanelli, Less is better? Intraindividual and interindividual comparison between 0.075 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine and 0.1 mmol/kg of gadoterate meglumine for cranial MRI. European Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 83, pp. 1245- 1249 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.EJRAD.2014.03.030
F. Pediconi, R. Kubik-Huch, B. Chilla, C. Schwenke, K. Kinkel, Intra-individual randomised comparison of gadobutrol 1.0 M versus gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M in patients scheduled for preoperative breast MRI European Radiology. ,vol. 23, pp. 84- 92 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00330-012-2557-4
Kerstin U. Bauner, Maximilian F. Reiser, Armin M. Huber, Low dose gadobenate dimeglumine for imaging of chronic myocardial infarction in comparison with standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine. Investigative Radiology. ,vol. 44, pp. 95- 104 ,(2009) , 10.1097/RLI.0B013E3181911EAB
Nancy A. Obuchowski, Peter J. Mazzone, Abraham H. Dachman, Bias, underestimation of risk, and loss of statistical power in patient-level analyses of lesion detection European Radiology. ,vol. 20, pp. 584- 594 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S00330-009-1590-4
Frederik L. Giesel, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk, Iain D. Wilkinson, Peter Siegler, Claus W. von der Lieth, Martin Frank, Klaus P. Lodemann, Marco Essig, Influence of human serum albumin on longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates (r1 and r2) of magnetic resonance contrast agents. Investigative Radiology. ,vol. 41, pp. 222- 228 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.RLI.0000192421.81037.D5
Laura Martincich, Matthieu Faivre-Pierret, Christian M. Zechmann, Stefano Corcione, Harrie C. M. van den Bosch, Wei-Jun Peng, Antonella Petrillo, Katja C. Siegmann, Johannes T. Heverhagen, Pietro Panizza, Hans-Björn Gehl, Felix Diekmann, Federica Pediconi, Lin Ma, Fiona J. Gilbert, Francesco Sardanelli, Paolo Belli, Marco Salvatore, Karl-Friedrich Kreitner, Claudia M. Weiss, Chiara Zuiani, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine for Breast MR Imaging (DETECT Trial) Radiology. ,vol. 258, pp. 396- 408 ,(2011) , 10.1148/RADIOL.10100968
Federica Pediconi, Carlo Catalano, Simona Padula, Antonella Roselli, Valeria Dominelli, Sabrina Cagioli, Miles A. Kirchin, Gianpaolo Pirovano, Roberto Passariello, Contrast-enhanced MR mammography: improved lesion detection and differentiation with gadobenate dimeglumine American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 191, pp. 1339- 1346 ,(2008) , 10.2214/AJR.07.3533
E. Kanal, K. Maravilla, H.A. Rowley, Gadolinium Contrast Agents for CNS Imaging: Current Concepts and Clinical Evidence American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 35, pp. 2215- 2226 ,(2014) , 10.3174/AJNR.A3917