The Conventionalization of Local Food: Farm Reflections on Local, Alternative Beef Marketing Groups

作者: Phil Mount , John Smithers

DOI: 10.5304/JAFSCD.2014.043.002

关键词: Distribution (economics)Product (business)Scale (social sciences)Direct marketingFarm Gate MarketingIntermediaryEconomicsCommodityFood marketingMarketing

摘要: Across North America, the local food market has been peddled as an alternative or value-added production and marketing niche for small midscale family farms. Many former commodity farmers are now selling product to consumers — either on their own, with groups of farmers, cooperatives, through intermediaries active distribution chains. The literature conventionalization organic suggests that larger farm scale intermediary-controlled chain may produce unintended effects producers in these markets. same also questions role shaping motivations. Reflections from first-adopters experiences channels both direct-to-consumer could provide insight into "scaling up" a potential move toward food. In this paper we investigate two models "local beef" operate province Ontario: one organized by reliant direct marketing, second, larger-scale model, led purchase farmers. Through analysis interviews borrowing adoption innovation frameworks, present farmers' words some factors motivations attract types innovation, try expose gap between expectations outcomes. findings help gauge how group operation influences results, relates processes conventionalization, what means future groups.

参考文章(35)
Nick McCann, Frank Montabon, Strategies for Accessing Volume Markets in the Beef Industry: A Review of Three Case Studies The Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development. ,vol. 2, pp. 37- 49 ,(2012) , 10.5304/JAFSCD.2012.022.014
David Sunding, David Zilberman, Chapter 4 The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector Handbook of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 1, pp. 207- 261 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S1574-0072(01)10007-1
Kathryn Ruhf, Kate Clancy, Is Local Enough? Some Arguments for Regional Food Systems Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues. ,vol. 25, pp. 1- 5 ,(2010)
Niels Röling, Pathways for impact: scientists' different perspectives on agricultural innovation International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. ,vol. 7, pp. 83- 94 ,(2009) , 10.3763/IJAS.2009.0043
M. Kneafsey, The region in food—important or irrelevant? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. ,vol. 3, pp. 177- 190 ,(2010) , 10.1093/CJRES/RSQ012
Carla Barbieri, Edward Mahoney, Why is diversification an attractive farm adjustment strategy? Insights from Texas farmers and ranchers Journal of Rural Studies. ,vol. 25, pp. 58- 66 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2008.06.001
Ingrid Verhaegen, Guido Van Huylenbroeck, Costs and benefits for farmers participating in innovative marketing channels for quality food products Journal of Rural Studies. ,vol. 17, pp. 443- 456 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00017-1