A random walk model for dispersion in inhomogeneous turbulence in a convective boundary layer

作者: Ashok K. Luhar , Rex E. Britter

DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(89)90516-7

关键词: TurbulenceConvective Boundary LayerMean flowSkewnessMathematical analysisMathematicsGaussianRandom walkLangevin equationClassical mechanicsProbability density functionPollution

摘要: It is necessary for a random walk model to satisfy the well-mixed criterion which requires that if particles of tracer are initially well mixed in ambient fluid they will remain so. Models applied so far dispersion convective boundary layer where turbulence inhomogeneous and skew require non-Gaussian forcing do not this condition. In work developed based on approach Thomson (1987, J. Fluid Mech.180,529–556) satisfies condition, incorporates skewness vertical velocity has Gaussian forcing. The skewed probability distribution function (PDF) equation Baerentsen Berkowicz (1984, Atmospheric Environment18, 701–712) used derive equation. diffusion layer. validity closure assumption σA = wAand σb wA, σB updraft downdraft standard deviations, respectively wA andwB mean velocities, respectively, analyzed quantitatively with measured values various statistical parameters involved PDF Results reveal quite satisfactory. new general reduces one-dimensional equations Wilson et al. (1983, Boundary-Layer Met. 27,163–169) Mech. 180, 529–556) when without any flow, basic Langevin homogeneous. Predictions made dimensionless crosswind integrated concentrations, particle height, spread three source heights step sizes. comparison results laboratory measurements Willis Deardorff(1976, Q. Jl R. met. Soc.102,427–445; 1978, Environment12,1305–1311; 1981, Environment15,109–117) de Baas (1986, Soc.112,165–180) Sawford Guest atmos. Sci.44,1152–1165) models forcing, shows simulates experimental features well. becomes homogeneous after X≈6. maximum ground level concentrations better predicted by model.

参考文章(29)
Atmospheric Turbulence and Air Pollution Modelling Atmospheric Turbulence and Air Pollution Modelling. ,(1982) , 10.1007/978-94-010-9112-1
G. E. Willis, J. W. Deardorff, A laboratory model of diffusion into the convective planetary boundary layer Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. ,vol. 102, pp. 427- 445 ,(1976) , 10.1002/QJ.49710243212
Paul J. Sullivan, Longitudinal dispersion within a two-dimensional turbulent shear flow Journal of Fluid Mechanics. ,vol. 49, pp. 551- 576 ,(1971) , 10.1017/S0022112071002258
J. C. R. Hunt, J. C. Kaimal, J. E. Gaynor, Eddy structure in the convective boundary layer—new measurements and new concepts Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. ,vol. 114, pp. 827- 858 ,(1988) , 10.1002/QJ.49711448202
D. H. Lenschow, P. L. Stephens, The role of thermals in the convective boundary layer Boundary-Layer Meteorology. ,vol. 19, pp. 509- 532 ,(1980) , 10.1007/BF00122351
B. L. Sawford, F. M. Guest, Lagrangian Stochastic Analysis of Flux-Gradient Relationships in the Convective Boundary Layer Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. ,vol. 44, pp. 1152- 1165 ,(1987) , 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1152:LSAOFG>2.0.CO;2