Analyzing Temporal Variability in Inventory Data for Life Cycle Assessment: Implications in the Context of Circular Economy

作者: Sayyed Shoaib-ul-Hasan , Malvina Roci , Farazee M. A. Asif , Niloufar Salehi , Amir Rashid

DOI: 10.3390/SU13010344

关键词: Decision support systemInventory dataLife-cycle assessmentLife cycle inventoryContext (language use)Product (category theory)Environmental economicsPerformance improvementBusiness modelSupply chainCircular economyComputer scienceEnvironmental impact assessmentInventory analysis

摘要: Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used frequently as a decision support tool for evaluating different design choices products based on their environmental impacts. A life usually comprises several phases of varying timespans. The amount emissions generated from product could be significantly one another. In conventional LCA, the are aggregated at inventory analysis stage, which then an input impact assessment. However, when aggregated, temporal variability data ignored, may result in inaccurate Besides, LCA does not consider circular with multiple use cycles. It poses difficulties identifying hotspots emission-intensive activities potential to mislead conclusions and implications both practice policy. To address this issue analyze embedded variations CE context, paper proposes calculating emission intensity each phase. argued that comparing intensity, timespan individual phases, stage offers complementary approach traditional aggregate emission-based approach. scenario, it helps identify significant issues during relevant performance improvement opportunities through product, business model, supply chain design.

参考文章(30)
Mary Ann Curran, Strengths and Limitations of Life Cycle Assessment Springer Netherlands. pp. 189- 206 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_6
Stefanie Hellweg, Thomas B. Hofstetter, Konrad Hungerbuhler, Discounting and the environment should current impacts be weighted differently than impacts harming future generations International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 8, pp. 8- 18 ,(2003) , 10.1007/BF02978744
Maurizio Bevilacqua, Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica, Giancarlo Giacchetta, Maurizio Bevilacqua, Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica, Giancarlo Giacchetta, LCA Process in the Eco-Design Process Design for Environment as a Tool for the Development of a Sustainable Supply Chain. pp. 33- 60 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-1-4471-2461-0_3
Shelie A. Miller, Stephen Moysey, Benjamin Sharp, Jose Alfaro, A Stochastic Approach to Model Dynamic Systems in Life Cycle Assessment Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 17, pp. 352- 362 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1530-9290.2012.00531.X
G. Rebitzer, T. Ekvall, R. Frischknecht, D. Hunkeler, G. Norris, T. Rydberg, W.-P. Schmidt, S. Suh, B.P. Weidema, D.W. Pennington, Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications Environment International. ,vol. 30, pp. 701- 720 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2003.11.005
David Dornfeld, Natalie Mady, Rachel Simon, Chris Yuan, Embedded Temporal Difference in Life Cycle Assessment: Case Study on VW Golf A4 Car Laboratory for Manufacturing and Sustainability. ,(2009)
John Reap, Felipe Roman, Scott Duncan, Bert Bras, A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 290- 300 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11367-008-0008-X
Mark A. J. Huijbregts, A general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 3, pp. 273- 280 ,(1998) , 10.1007/BF02979835
Maria B. G. Castro, Johannes A. M. Remmerswaal, Markus A. Reuter, Life cycle impact assessment of the average passenger vehicle in the Netherlands International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 8, pp. 297- 304 ,(2003) , 10.1007/BF02978922