A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the safety and efficacy of avanafil in subjects with erectile dysfunction.

作者: Irwin Goldstein , Andrew R. McCullough , LeRoy A. Jones , Wayne J. Hellstrom , Charles H. Bowden

DOI: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2011.02629.X

关键词: Sexual functionStandard treatmentDosingErectile dysfunctionClinical trialPhysical therapyAvanafilInternal medicineMedicinePlaceboAdverse effect

摘要: ABSTRACT Introduction Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors have become standard treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). Aim To prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of avanafil, a novel PDE5 inhibitor, in men with mild to severe ED. Methods In this multicenter, double‐blind, Phase 3 trial, 646 subjects were randomized receive avanafil (50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg) or placebo throughout 12‐week period. Subjects instructed take study drug 30 minutes prior initiation sexual activity. At least 12‐hour separation time between doses was required; no restrictions placed on food alcohol intake. Main Outcome Measures Improvement function (EF) measured by Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 (SEP2 SEP3) EF domain International Index Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. Results Mean change percentage successful attempts IIEF‐EF score significantly favored all over ( P  ≤ 0.001). Secondary analyses demonstrated achievement intercourse within 15 minutes dosing. Of 300 made during interval, 64% 71% avanafil‐treated compared 27% placebo‐treated subjects. Successful also >6 hours post dosing, 59% 83% 80 25% The most commonly reported adverse events taking included headache, flushing, nasal congestion; there drug‐related serious events. Conclusion Following 12 weeks without restrictions, significant improvements observed placebo. as early after dosing some Avanafil generally well tolerated Goldstein I, McCullough AR, Jones LA, Hellstrom WJ, Bowden CH, DiDonato K, Trask B, Day WW. A randomized, placebo‐controlled evaluation dysfunction. J Sex Med 12;9:1122–1133.

参考文章(19)
David O. Sussman, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. ,vol. 104, ,(2004)
Christopher S Saigal, Hunter Wessells, Jennifer Pace, Matt Schonlau, Timothy J Wilt, Urologic Diseases in America Project, Predictors and prevalence of erectile dysfunction in a racially diverse population. JAMA Internal Medicine. ,vol. 166, pp. 207- 212 ,(2006) , 10.1001/ARCHINTE.166.2.207
E Bischoff, Potency, selectivity, and consequences of nonselectivity of PDE inhibition. International Journal of Impotence Research. ,vol. 16, ,(2004) , 10.1038/SJ.IJIR.3901208
J. Kaufman, J. Dietrich, SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF AVANAFIL, A NEW PDE5 INHIBITOR FOR TREATING ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION European Urology Supplements. ,vol. 5, pp. 138- ,(2006) , 10.1016/S1569-9056(06)60469-7
Elizabeth Selvin, Arthur L. Burnett, Elizabeth A. Platz, Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in the US. The American Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 120, pp. 151- 157 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.AMJMED.2006.06.010
J D Corbin, Mechanisms of action of PDE5 inhibition in erectile dysfunction. International Journal of Impotence Research. ,vol. 16, ,(2004) , 10.1038/SJ.IJIR.3901205
Michael G. Wyllie, The underlying pathophysiology and causes of erectile dysfunction Clinical Cornerstone. ,vol. 7, pp. 19- 26 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S1098-3597(05)80045-6