The Effect of Abutment Surface Roughness on the Retention of Implant-Supported Crowns Cemented with Provisional Luting Cement
作者： Farid Shiezadeh , Seyyed Mohammad Abrisham , Mohammad Reza Nakhaei , Jalil Ganbarzadeh
关键词: Dentistry 、 Coping (architecture) 、 Abutment 、 Materials science 、 Cement 、 Ultimate tensile strength 、 Implant 、 Surface roughness 、 Implant supported 、 Dental implant
摘要: Introduction: Surface roughness can increase the retention of castings by ridges and grooves that are microretentive. This study compared implant-supported crowns when used with 3 different surface abutments one temporary cement. Methods: Thirty solid (ITI), 4 mm high, were divided into three groups randomly. In first group, 10 roughened sandblast (50-µm aluminum oxide) in second diamond bur. The third group had no treatment. Then, thirty implant fixture analogs (ITI) placed center acrylic cylinders. After a abutment was tightened on each analog 35 N/cm force. base metal made ITI using plastic coping. prepared copings cemented TempBond cement finally, pulled from universal test machine at cross speed 0.5cm/min. Results: mean tensile strength sandblasted, bur treated, control 64.38±8, 91.37±7.19, 58.61±1.93, respectively. Bur treated showed higher comparison two other groups. Conclusion: modification may be an effective method to crown is used.
mums.ac.ir参考文章(28)
S S Scherrer, U C Belser, H W Wiskott, The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading. International Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 12, pp. 255- 262 ,(1999)
Ching-Kai Lin, Yu-Hwa Pan, The effect of luting agents on the retention of dental implant-supported crowns. Chang Gung medical journal. ,vol. 28, pp. 403- ,(2005)
Rosemary Sadami Shinkai, Lena Katekawa Adachi, Karen Miashiro, Tomie Nakakuki de Campos, Hideki Yoshida, Pedro Tortamano Neto, Maria Luiza Moreira Arantes Frigerio, Effect of surface topography of implant abutments on retention of cemented single-tooth crowns. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. ,vol. 30, pp. 409- 413 ,(2010)
W Chee, D A Felton, P F Johnson, D Y Sullivan, Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better? International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 14, pp. 137- 141 ,(1999)
Pierre Simonis, Thomas Dufour, Henri Tenenbaum, Long-term implant survival and success: a 10-16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 772- 777 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1600-0501.2010.01912.X
Mario Bresciano, Gianmario Schierano, Carlo Manzella, Antonio Screti, Cristina Bignardi, Giulio Preti, Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 594- 598 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1600-0501.2005.01159.X
Hideki Maeyama, Takashi Sawase, Ryo Jimbo, Koji Kamada, Naoki Suketa, Junichi Fukui, Mitsuru Atsuta, Retentive Strength of Metal Copings on Prefabricated Abutments with Five Different Cements Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. ,vol. 7, pp. 229- 234 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1708-8208.2005.TB00068.X
Merrie H. Ramp, Donna L. Dixon, Lance C. Ramp, Larry C. Breeding, Lindsay L. Barber, Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 81, pp. 510- 514 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70203-9
Larry C. Breeding, Donna L. Dixon, Michele T. Bogacki, James D. Tietge, Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 68, pp. 737- 741 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90194-F
G.A. Zarb, A. Schmitt, The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 64, pp. 185- 194 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E