Benchmarking flexible meshes and regular grids for large-scale fluvial inundation modelling

作者: Jannis M. Hoch , Rens van Beek , Hessel C. Winsemius , Marc F.P. Bierkens

DOI: 10.1016/J.ADVWATRES.2018.09.003

关键词: Polygon meshComputational scienceScale (ratio)Flood forecastingFlood mythForcing (recursion theory)DiscretizationGridA priori and a posterioriComputer science

摘要: Abstract Damage resulting from flood events is increasing world-wide, requiring the implementation of mitigation and adaption measures. To facilitate their implementation, it essential to correctly model hazard at large scale, yet fine spatial resolution. reduce computational load models, flexible meshes are an efficient means compared uniform regular grids. Yet, thus far they have been applied only for bespoke small-scale studies a high level priori grid preparation. better understand possible advantages as well shortcomings application large-scale riverine inundation simulations, three different were derived Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) data with grids under identical spatially explicit hydrologic forcing by using GLOFRIM, framework integrated hydrologic-hydrodynamic modelling. By output global PCR-GLOBWB was passed hydrodynamic Delft3D Flexible Mesh. Results show that applying can be beneficial depending on envisaged purpose. For discharge similar accuracy obtained between grids, former generally having shorter run times. extent however, coarser gridding in upstream areas results poorer performance if assessed contingency maps. Moreover, while ratio minimum maximum resolution has limited impact water estimates may stronger influenced larger cells. . As this study presents small set realizations, additional research needs unravel how methods used choices discretizations influence performance. Generally, particularly discretization process involves more options, bringing responsibilities user. Once decision made purpose, valuable addition modelling approaches where short times essential, facilitating ensemble or operational forecasting.

参考文章(51)
Calum A. Baugh, Paul D. Bates, Guy Schumann, Mark A. Trigg, SRTM vegetation removal and hydrodynamic modeling accuracy Water Resources Research. ,vol. 49, pp. 5276- 5289 ,(2013) , 10.1002/WRCR.20412
Eytan Rocheta, Michael Sugiyanto, Fiona Johnson, Jason Evans, Ashish Sharma, How well do general circulation models represent low‐frequency rainfall variability? Water Resources Research. ,vol. 50, pp. 2108- 2123 ,(2014) , 10.1002/2012WR013085
Antonio Donato Nobre, Luz Adriana Cuartas, Marcos Rodrigo Momo, Dirceu Luís Severo, Adilson Pinheiro, Carlos Afonso Nobre, HAND contour: a new proxy predictor of inundation extent Hydrological Processes. ,vol. 30, pp. 320- 333 ,(2016) , 10.1002/HYP.10581
I. Harris, P.D. Jones, T.J. Osborn, D.H. Lister, Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset International Journal of Climatology. ,vol. 34, pp. 623- 642 ,(2014) , 10.1002/JOC.3711
M.S. Horritt, P.D. Bates, M.J. Mattinson, Effects of mesh resolution and topographic representation in 2D finite volume models of shallow water fluvial flow Journal of Hydrology. ,vol. 329, pp. 306- 314 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2006.02.016
Herman W. J. Kernkamp, Arthur Van Dam, Guus S. Stelling, Erik D. de Goede, Efficient scheme for the shallow water equations on unstructured grids with application to the Continental Shelf Ocean Dynamics. ,vol. 61, pp. 1175- 1188 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S10236-011-0423-6
Brenden Jongman, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Luc Feyen, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Reinhard Mechler, W. J. Wouter Botzen, Laurens M. Bouwer, Georg Pflug, Rodrigo Rojas, Philip J. Ward, Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods Nature Climate Change. ,vol. 4, pp. 264- 268 ,(2014) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE2124
T. J. Fewtrell, P. D. Bates, M. Horritt, N. M. Hunter, Evaluating the effect of scale in flood inundation modelling in urban environments Hydrological Processes. ,vol. 22, pp. 5107- 5118 ,(2008) , 10.1002/HYP.7148