Volatility analysis of returns and risk: Family versus nonfamily firms

作者: Mara Madaleno , , Elisabete Vieira ,

DOI: 10.3934/QFE.2018.2.348

关键词: Negative relationshipFinancial crisisDescriptive statisticsMonetary economicsVolatility (finance)EconomicsInteractionPositive relationship

摘要: Family firms (FF) tend to be classified as less risky and volatile than nonfamily (NFF). This article aims examine whether there are differences in risk volatility between FF NFF, using Portuguese listed during 2008 2017. Through different models specifications, we were able verify that exists a positive relationship identified the volatility-return nexus which depends on model used, even so, negative case of FF, but is stronger NFF descriptive statistics reveal. Furthermore, it was found no considerable terms liquidity-volatility two types firms, cannot argue returns turnover higher NFF. It also more illiquid stocks have clear The crisis effect explain positively negatively, being impact lower for Our results do not strictly confirm fact provided variables interaction effects may risk-averse investor will prone invest stocks, while lover agent prefer look at when building their investment portfolios.

参考文章(45)
María del Mar Miralles Quirós, Inés Lisboa, Family firms' heterogeneity and firm risk Boletín de estudios económicos. ,vol. 70, pp. 139- 157 ,(2015)
Najah Attig, Narjess Boubakri, Sadok El Ghoul, Omrane Guedhami, The Global Financial Crisis, Family Control, and Dividend Policy Financial Management. ,vol. 45, pp. 291- 313 ,(2016) , 10.1111/FIMA.12115
Lukas Setia‐Atmaja, Dividend and debt policies of family controlled firms: The impact of board independence International Journal of Managerial Finance. ,vol. 6, pp. 128- 142 ,(2010) , 10.1108/17439131011032059
Pankaj C. Patel, James J. Chrisman, Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms Strategic Management Journal. ,vol. 35, pp. 617- 627 ,(2014) , 10.1002/SMJ.2119
Lucio Cassia, Alfredo De Massis, Emanuele Pizzurno, Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms : an empirically grounded theoretical framework International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. ,vol. 18, pp. 198- 232 ,(2012) , 10.1108/13552551211204229
Richard T. Baillie, Ramon P. DeGennaro, Stock Returns and Volatility The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. ,vol. 25, pp. 203- 214 ,(1990) , 10.2307/2330824
Patricio Duran, Nadine Kammerlander, Marc van Essen, Thomas Zellweger, Doing More with Less: Innovation Input and Output in Family Firms Academy of Management Journal. ,vol. 59, pp. 1224- 1264 ,(2016) , 10.5465/AMJ.2014.0424
Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, Tim Bollerslev, Robert F. Engle, A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time-Varying Covariances Journal of Political Economy. ,vol. 96, pp. 116- 131 ,(1988) , 10.1086/261527
Tim Bollerslev, Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity Journal of Econometrics. ,vol. 31, pp. 307- 327 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
Fabrizio Erbetta, Anna Menozzi, Guido Corbetta, Giovanni Fraquelli, Assessing family firm performance using frontier analysis techniques: Evidence from Italian manufacturing industries Journal of Family Business Strategy. ,vol. 4, pp. 106- 117 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JFBS.2013.04.001