Robotic radical prostatectomy as the initial step in multimodal therapy for men with high-risk localised prostate cancer: initial experience of 160 men.

作者: Stephen S. Connolly , Paul J. Cathcart , Paul Gilmore , Michael Kerger , Helen Crowe

DOI: 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2011.10548.X

关键词: ProstatectomyProstate-specific antigenUrologySurgeryMedicineTransrectal biopsyHazard ratioInterquartile rangeBiochemical recurrenceLaparoscopic radical prostatectomyAndrogen deprivation therapy

摘要: Objectives • To report the outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) for men with localised high-risk prostate cancer at diagnosis. Although commonly managed by radiotherapy (RT) prolonged androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), we hypothesize that initiation multimodal RALP is oncologically efficacious and may allow many to avoid ADT. Patients methods Between December 2003 September 2010, 1480 underwent whom 160 fulfilled National Comprehensive Control Network criteria disease (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 20 ng/mL and/or clinical stage, cT ≥ 3 biopsy Gleason score 8). Biochemical recurrence (postoperative PSA 0.2) was used assess after monotherapy. Treatment failure defined as either a rising level salvage RT or Results The mean age ± standard deviation 63.1 6.3 years. Median 9.95 (interquartile range 6.0-21.4). Analysis specimen showed 8-10 cancers in 65 (41%), extracapsular disease, pT 3, 96 (60%) which seminal vesicle invasion evident 36 (23%). Downgrading occurred 64 (40% total group) five (3%) were downstaged pT2 disease. By contrast, any upgrading 29 (18% upstaging 68 (43%). overall positive surgical margin rate 38%, correlating stage (15%) pT3 (53%). With median follow-up 26.2 months 5.5-37.3), two non-cancer-related deaths have (overall survival 98.8%; cancer-specific 100%), biochemical has 53 (33%). surgery served monotherapy (n= 117, 73%), been followed 24, 15%) ADT 43, 27%). Overall 2-year 3-year treatment 31 41%, respectively. Serum only independent predictor (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, P= 0.001) although strong trend observed both (HR 1.22, 0.058) number cores on transrectal 1.06, 0.057). Conclusions incorporating use postoperative good management strategy this aggressive variant cancer. At excess 2 years, found low rates enabling high proportion remain free

参考文章(46)
James Mohler, Robert R. Bahnson, Barry Boston, J. Erik Busby, Anthony D'Amico, James A. Eastham, Charles A. Enke, Daniel George, Eric Mark Horwitz, Robert P. Huben, Philip Kantoff, Mark Kawachi, Michael Kuettel, Paul H. Lange, Gary MacVicar, Elizabeth R. Plimack, Julio M. Pow-Sang, Mack Roach, Eric Rohren, Bruce J. Roth, Dennis C. Shrieve, Matthew R. Smith, Sandy Srinivas, Przemyslaw Twardowski, Patrick C. Walsh, Prostate cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network. ,vol. 8, pp. 162- 200 ,(2010) , 10.6004/JNCCN.2010.0012
Stephen B Williams, Sandip M Prasad, Aaron C Weinberg, Jeremy B Shelton, Nathanael D Hevelone, Stuart R Lipsitz, Jim C Hu, None, Trends in the care of radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2006 BJU International. ,vol. 108, pp. 49- 55 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2010.09822.X
M. Manoharan, V.G. Bird, S.S. Kim, F. Civantos, M.S. Soloway, Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of ≥8 BJUI. ,vol. 92, pp. 539- 544 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1464-410X.2003.04419.X
Chris O Wambi, Sameer A Siddiqui, L Spencer Krane, Piyush K Agarwal, Hans J Stricker, James O Peabody, None, Early oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer. BJUI. ,vol. 106, pp. 1739- 1745 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2010.09484.X
M V Pilepich, R Caplan, R W Byhardt, C A Lawton, M J Gallagher, J B Mesic, G E Hanks, C T Coughlin, A Porter, W U Shipley, D Grignon, Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85-31. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 15, pp. 1013- 1021 ,(1997) , 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.1013
O Al-Salihi, A Mitra, H Payne, Challenge of dose escalation in locally advanced unfavourable prostate cancer using HDR brachytherapy. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. ,vol. 9, pp. 370- 373 ,(2006) , 10.1038/SJ.PCAN.4500893
Gerard P McVey, Chris Parker, Adjuvant vs. salvage radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer. Current Opinion in Urology. ,vol. 20, pp. 229- 233 ,(2010) , 10.1097/MOU.0B013E3283383B6E
Hein Van Poppel, Hans Goethuys, Piet Callewaert, Luc Vanuytsel, Wim Van de Voorde, Luc Baert, Radical Prostatectomy Can Provide a Cure For Well–Selected Clinical Stage T3 Prostate Cancer European Urology. ,vol. 38, pp. 372- 379 ,(2000) , 10.1159/000020311
Zumre A. Alicikus, Yoshiya Yamada, Zhigang Zhang, Xin Pei, Margie Hunt, Marisa Kollmeier, Brett Cox, Michael J. Zelefsky, Ten-Year Outcomes of High-Dose, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer Cancer. ,vol. 117, pp. 1429- 1437 ,(2011) , 10.1002/CNCR.25467
Sten Nilsson, Bo Johan Norlén, Anders Widmark, A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in prostate cancer Acta Oncologica. ,vol. 43, pp. 316- 381 ,(2004) , 10.1080/02841860410030661