作者: Ruth McAreavey
DOI: 10.1111/SORU.12010
关键词: Context (language use) 、 Information ethics 、 Public relations 、 Applied ethics 、 Empirical research 、 Sociology 、 Research ethics 、 Asset (economics) 、 Harm 、 Professional ethics 、 Sociology and Political Science
摘要: In recent years concerns over litigation and the trend towards close monitoring of academic activity has seen effective hijacking research ethics by university managers bureaucrats. This can effectively curtail cutting edge as perceived ‘safe’ strategies are encouraged. However, is about more than governance. Ultimately, it seeks to avoid harm increase benefits society. Rural development debate fairly quiet on question ethics, leaving guidance professional bodies. study draws empirical that examined lives migrant communities in Northern Ireland. context increasingly diverse rural actors provides a backdrop for way which researcher navigates through ethical issues they unfold field. The analysis relocate from being an annoying bureaucratic requirement one where inherent rigorous practice. It reveals how attention contribute effective, situated reflexive practice, thus transforming become asset researchers.