The Porter Five-forces Industry Analysis Framework For Religious Nonprofits: A conceptual analysis

作者: Michael E. Cafferky

DOI:

关键词: Key (cryptography)Market analysisOrganizational theoryPublic relationsMillerPolitical science

摘要: Goold (1997) has argued that the Porter (1980) five-forces framework for industry analysis is not applicable to nonprofits. In light of recent essays (e.g. Miller, 2002) as well literature from world religious nonprofit organizations and organization theory, analyzed through a review representative literature. The arena was chosen this conceptual based on an assumed key difference between nonprofits for-profit firms: stronger influence mission in strategy formulation compared with external environment. Implications further research are suggested.

参考文章(44)
William F. Crittenden, Victoria L. Crittenden, Strategic Planning in Third-Sector Organizations Journal of Managerial Issues. ,vol. 9, pp. 86- ,(1997)
David Knoke, David Prensky, What Relevance do Organization Theories have for Voluntary Associations Social Science Quarterly. ,vol. 65, pp. 3- 20 ,(1984)
John Macquarrie, God and secularity Westminster Press. ,(1967)
Ezra Earl Jones, Strategies for new churches ,(1976)
Kenneth R. Andrews, The Concept of Corporate Strategy ,(1971)
Michael E. Porter, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors Social Science Research Network. ,(1980)
Neil H. Snyder, William F. Glueck, Can Environmental Volatility Be Measured Objectively Academy of Management Journal. ,vol. 25, pp. 185- 192 ,(1982) , 10.5465/256033
H. Kirk Downey, Don Hellriegel, John W. Slocum, Environmental Uncertainty: The Construct and Its Application Administrative Science Quarterly. ,vol. 20, pp. 613- ,(1975) , 10.2307/2392027
Melissa M. Stone, Planning as Strategy in Nonprofit Organizations: An Exploratory Study: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. ,vol. 18, pp. 297- 315 ,(1989) , 10.1177/089976408901800403