Investing in the future of GERD

作者: M. Michael Wolfe , Robert C. Lowe

DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0B013E318032390F

关键词: GERDIntensive care medicineGastric acidProkinetic agentQuality of lifeMedicineProton-pump inhibitorEsophageal diseaseDiseaseGastroenterologyInternal medicineAdverse effect

摘要: Despite being principally a motor disorder characterized by transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and impaired clearance mechanisms, the therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been directed at neutralizing or inhibiting acid secretion. Antacids comprised medical treatment GERD for centuries, with later additions consisting antisecretory agents, H 2 -receptor antagonists and, more recently, proton pump inhibitors. Although both classes drugs, in particular latter, have proven invaluable treating GERD, each possesses its own drawbacks, neither addresses inherent underlying pathologic abnormality. Unfortunately, presently available prokinetic agents are either largely ineffective, associated significant adverse effects, both. In addition to medication, mechanical barriers aimed preventing employed decades, improvements surgical fundoplication, including minimally invasive approaches, continue evolve. quality life most individuals treated surgically, many report durability these procedures is scrutinized. More various endoscopic modalities as therapeutic alternatives, which met variable rates success not without risk. The future will likely include approaches development specific, thus safer effective, agents. addition, it that new + ,K -ATPase inhibitors be formulated affect consistent, reliable, prolonged gastric suppression, thereby provide even greater benefit tens millions patients GERD.

参考文章(27)
P A Testoni, E Masci, S Passaretti, M Guslandi, A Tittobello, Comparison of ranitidine, domperidone maleate and ranitidine + domperidone maleate in the short-term treatment of reflux oesophagitis. Drugs Under Experimental and Clinical Research. ,vol. 11, pp. 687- 692 ,(1985)
C Callachan, R W McCallum, J Avella, S M Fink, G R Winnan, Metoclopramide in gastroesophageal reflux disease: rationale for its use and results of a double-blind trial. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 79, pp. 165- 172 ,(1984)
Philip O Katz, Optimizing medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: state of the art. Reviews in Gastroenterological Disorders. ,vol. 3, pp. 59- 69 ,(2003)
Jai Moo Shin, Michel Homerin, Florence Domagala, Hervé Ficheux, George Sachs, Characterization of the inhibitory activity of tenatoprazole on the gastric H+,K+-ATPase in vitro and in vivo Biochemical Pharmacology. ,vol. 71, pp. 837- 849 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.BCP.2005.11.030
F Pace, F Santalucia, G Bianchi Porro, Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis. Gut. ,vol. 32, pp. 845- 848 ,(1991) , 10.1136/GUT.32.8.845
Richard Rothstein, Charles Filipi, Karel Caca, Ronald Pruitt, Klaus Mergener, Alfonso Torquati, Gregory Haber, Yang Chen, Kenneth Chang, David Wong, Jacques Deviere, Douglas Pleskow, Charles Lightdale, Alain Ades, Richard Kozarek, William Richards, Anthony Lembo, Endoscopic Full-Thickness Plication for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial Gastroenterology. ,vol. 131, pp. 704- 712 ,(2006) , 10.1053/J.GASTRO.2006.07.004
P. N Maton, Profile and assessment of GERD pharmacotherapy. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 70, ,(2003) , 10.3949/CCJM.70.SUPPL_5.S51
D. Castell, D. Silvers, T. Littlejohn, W. Orr, J. Napolitano, N. Oleka, L. Jokubaitis, , Cisapride 20 mg b.d. for preventing symptoms of GERD induced by a provocative meal Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. ,vol. 13, pp. 787- 794 ,(1999) , 10.1046/J.1365-2036.1999.00525.X