Who Should Be Committable

作者: Michael Lavin

DOI:

关键词: Treatment RefusalCompetence (law)LawSupreme courtPsychologyInvoluntary commitment

摘要: The paper criticizes the prevailing, danger-based involuntary commitment criteria that have characterized U.S. law since Supreme Court's 1975 O'Connor v. Donaldson decision. Numerous medical and moral inadequacies are identified in -style criteria. It is argued a treatment-based criterion—derived from American Psychiatric Association's Model Commitment Law, but version disdains reliance on dangerousness to self or others as ground for commitment—is medically morally preferable prevailing standard. This approach respects competent treatment refusals, does permit treatable, incompetent individuals be involuntarily hospitalized treatment. defended against possible objections some of its advantages identified.

参考文章(14)
Mary Ann Gardell Cutter, Earl E. Shelp, Competency : a study of informal competency determinations in primary care Kluwer Academic Publishers. ,(1991)
Robert I. Simon, Robert L. Sadoff, Psychiatric Malpractice: Cases and Comments for Clinicians ,(1992)
H L.A. Hart, Punishment and responsibility ,(1968)
M. Drake, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.) American Journal of Occupational Therapy. ,vol. 42, pp. 683- 684 ,(1988) , 10.5014/AJOT.42.10.683B
Faden Rr, Beauchamp Tl, King Nm, A History and Theory of Informed Consent ,(1986)
John A Talbott, Stuart C Yudofsky, Robert E Hales, Textbook of Psychiatry ,(1988)
Tom L. Beauchamp, James Franklin Childress, Principles of biomedical ethics ,(1979)
Ming T. Tsuang, Suicide in Schizophrenics, Manics, Depressives, and Surgical Controls Archives of General Psychiatry. ,vol. 35, pp. 153- 155 ,(1978) , 10.1001/ARCHPSYC.1978.01770260031002
Janet B. W. Williams, Michael First, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Encyclopedia of Social Work. ,(2013) , 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199975839.013.104
Allen E. Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. ,vol. 52, pp. 232- 237 ,(1990) , 10.1017/CBO9781139171946