作者: M Peterson
关键词: Economics 、 Law 、 Law and economics 、 Interpretation (philosophy) 、 Decision rule 、 Public policy 、 Arrow's impossibility theorem 、 Argument 、 Precautionary principle 、 Normative 、 Theoretical psychology
摘要: Two interpretations of the precautionary principle are considered. According to normative (action-guiding) interpretation, should be characterised in terms what it urges doctors and other decision makers do. epistemic (belief-guiding) us believe. This paper recommends against use as a rule medical making, based on an impossibility theorem presented Peterson (2005). However, main point is argument effect that theoretical problems associated with can overcome by paying greater attention its dimension. Three principles inherent approach risk analysis defended.