作者: Ian G. Dobbins , Neal E. A. Kroll , Qiang Liu
DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1306
关键词: Optimal distinctiveness theory 、 Self-confidence 、 Cognitive psychology 、 Variance (accounting) 、 Memoria 、 Recognition memory 、 Psychology 、 Communication 、 Psychophysics 、 Cognition
摘要: S. E. Clark (1997) offered a modified signal-detection explanation of the confidence-accuracy inversions observed in Tulving's (1981) experiments. In addition to replicating Tulving (1981), we had participants make "remember-familiar" judgments. Confidence and accuracy dissociated across subjective reports. Response confidence differed only for judgments based on familiarity, whereas "remember" responses. Clark's model does not predict this, nor can it mimic performance all conditions. We propose that although "knowing" be accommodated within an equal variance account, "remembering" is governed by contextual constraints influence distinctiveness information upon which rely during The current paradigm pictorial analogue H. L. Roediger K. B. McDermott's (1995) claim explicitly remember thematically related items were actually seen study.