Specialized Feeding Modes Promote Coexistence of Competing Herbivores: Insights from a Metabolic Pool Model

作者: Matthew P. Daugherty

DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0318

关键词: WeedGuildPredationCompetition (biology)Interspecific competitionHerbivoreBiologySpecialization (functional)Biomass (ecology)Ecology

摘要: Competition theory suggests that a single resource should support one consumer species. However, competitive exclusion may be relaxed by periodic disturbances, temporal or spatial segregation of consumers, fine-scale partitioning. This last mechanism especially common for competing phytophagous insects. Unlike many predators, herbivores rarely consume their entire prey item and often have specialized feeding modes on specific plant parts. Thus, different herbivore guilds “avoid” each other, thereby facilitating coexistence. I analyzed simplified metabolic pool model includes two types: “leaf chewer” “phloem feeder.” Phytophagous insects with the same mode never coexisted, but coexist stably—depending productivity carbohydrate pool, allocation to vegetative biomass, defoliation rate. Differences in are equivalent fine scale partitioning, potentially within individual plant. addition physiological detail changes predictions simple competition models is relevant weed biocontrol informing decisions which agents introduce.

参考文章(47)
Randal Arsenault, Norman Owen-Smith, Facilitation versus competition in grazing herbivore assemblages Oikos. ,vol. 97, pp. 313- 318 ,(2002) , 10.1034/J.1600-0706.2002.970301.X
Anurag A. Agrawal, Richard Karban, Ramana G. Colfer, How leaf domatia and induced plant resistance affect herbivores, natural enemies and plant performance Oikos. ,vol. 89, pp. 70- 80 ,(2000) , 10.1034/J.1600-0706.2000.890108.X
Gregory J. Masters, T. Hefin Jones, Matthew Rogers, Host-plant mediated effects of root herbivory on insect seed predators and their parasitoids Oecologia. ,vol. 127, pp. 246- 250 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S004420000569
Harald Steen, Atle Mysterud, Gunnar Austrheim, Sheep grazing and rodent populations: evidence of negative interactions from a landscape scale experiment Oecologia. ,vol. 143, pp. 357- 364 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S00442-004-1792-Z
James P Grover, Robert D Holt, Disentangling Resource and Apparent Competition: Realistic Models for Plant-herbivore Communities Journal of Theoretical Biology. ,vol. 191, pp. 353- 376 ,(1998) , 10.1006/JTBI.1997.0562
T. M. Bezemer, R. Wagenaar, N. M. Van Dam, F. L. Wäckers, Interactions between above- and belowground insect herbivores as mediated by the plant defense system Oikos. ,vol. 101, pp. 555- 562 ,(2003) , 10.1034/J.1600-0706.2003.12424.X
THOMAS L. BULTMAN, STANLEY H. FAETH, Patterns of intra‐ and interspecific association in leaf‐mining insects on three oak host species Ecological Entomology. ,vol. 10, pp. 121- 129 ,(1985) , 10.1111/J.1365-2311.1985.TB00541.X
W M Getz, A P Gutierrez, A Perspective on Systems Analysis in Crop Production and Insect Pest Management Annual Review of Entomology. ,vol. 27, pp. 447- 466 ,(1982) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.EN.27.010182.002311
R F Denno, M S McClure, J R Ott, Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects : competition reexamined and resurrected Annual Review of Entomology. ,vol. 40, pp. 297- 331 ,(1995) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.EN.40.010195.001501
Stephen B. Heard, Processing Chain Ecology: Resource Condition and Interspecific Interactions Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 63, pp. 451- 464 ,(1994) , 10.2307/5562