Evaluation of the tactile detection response task in a laboratory test using a surrogate driving set-up
作者： Roland Schindhelm , Eike Schmidt
DOI: 10.1049/IET-ITS.2014.0186
关键词: Poison control 、 Intrusiveness 、 Simulation 、 Task (project management) 、 Cognitive load 、 Machine learning 、 Cognition 、 Artificial intelligence 、 Human multitasking 、 Engineering 、 Set (psychology) 、 Cognitive resource theory
摘要: This study presents findings of a laboratory experiment which aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and intrusiveness tactile detection response task (TDRT) methodology. Various single-task, dual-task triple-task scenarios were compared. The included surrogate driving (tracking task) different secondary tasks (N-back, reference (SuRT)). results suggest that TDRT is sensitive to load levels primarily demand for cognitive resources (N-back). Sensitivity variations visual-manual could not be shown (SuRT). seems also able differentiate between modes primary varies in terms (visual against auditory tracking task). RESULTS indicated on performance depending type underlying scenario. As conclusion, can recommended as method assess attentional effects task, but should used with caution strong motor demands. Language: en
safetylit.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(11)
Johan Engström, Nina Åberg, Emma Johansson, Jakob Hammarbäck, Comparison between Visual and Tactile Signal Detection Tasks Applied to the Safety Assessment of In-Vehicle Information Systems Driving Assessment 2005: 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle DesignNissan Technical Center - North AmericaUniversity of Iowa, Iowa CityHonda R & D Americas, IncorporatedToyota Technical Center, U.S.A.Federal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration5DT, Inc.DriveSafety, Inc.Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietySeeing MachinesTransportation Research BoardUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of LeedsUniversity of Minnesota, MinneapolisUniversity of Michigan Transportation Research InstituteVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. ,vol. 3, pp. 232- 239 ,(2017) , 10.17077/DRIVINGASSESSMENT.1166
John A. Michon, A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do? Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. pp. 485- 524 ,(1985) , 10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_19
Johan Engström, Pontus Larsson, Christian Larsson, Comparison of Static and Driving Simulator Venues for the Tactile Detection Response Task 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle DesignHonda R&D Americas, IncorporatedNissan Technical Center, North AmericaToyota Collaborative Safety Research CenterDriveCam, IncorporatedLiberty Mutual Research Institute for SafetyTransportation Research BoardFederal Highway AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration. ,vol. 7, pp. 369- 375 ,(2017) , 10.17077/DRIVINGASSESSMENT.1514
Richard A Young, Li Hsieh, Sean Seaman, THE TACTILE DETECTION RESPONSE TASK: PRELIMINARY VALIDATION FOR MEASURING THE ATTENTIONAL EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE LOAD 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle DesignHonda R&D Americas, IncorporatedNissan Technical Center, North AmericaToyota Collaborative Safety Research CenterDriveCam, IncorporatedLiberty Mutual Research Institute for SafetyTransportation Research BoardFederal Highway AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration. ,vol. 25, pp. 56- 59 ,(2017) , 10.17077/DRIVINGASSESSMENT.1469
Charles B Walter, Stephan P Swinnen, Asymmetric interlimb interference during the performance of a dynamic bimanual task Brain and Cognition. ,vol. 14, pp. 185- 200 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90028-M
Barbara Metz, Nadja Schömig, Hans-Peter Krüger, Attention during visual secondary tasks in driving: Adaptation to the demands of the driving task Transportation Research Part F-traffic Psychology and Behaviour. ,vol. 14, pp. 369- 380 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.TRF.2011.04.004
Michael Pettitt, Gary Burnett, Visual Demand Evaluation Methods for In-Vehicle Interfaces International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction. ,vol. 2, pp. 45- 57 ,(2010) , 10.4018/JMHCI.2010100103
Jill Whitall, Larry Forrester, Suning Song, Dual-Finger Preferred-Speed Tapping: Effects of Coordination Mode and Anatomical Finger and Limb Pairings Journal of Motor Behavior. ,vol. 31, pp. 325- 339 ,(1999) , 10.1080/00222899909600998
C. Gelau, R. Schindhelm, Enhancing the occlusion technique as an assessment tool for driver visual distraction Iet Intelligent Transport Systems. ,vol. 4, pp. 346- 355 ,(2010) , 10.1049/IET-ITS.2009.0115
Marie-Pierre Bruyas, Laëtitia Dumont, Sensitivity of detection response task (DRT) to driving demand and task difficulty 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle DesignHonda R&D Americas, IncorporatedNissan Technical Center, North AmericaToyota Collaborative Safety Research CenterDriveCam, IncorporatedLiberty Mutual Research Institute for SafetyTransportation Research BoardFederal Highway AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration. ,vol. 25, pp. 12- 15 ,(2017) , 10.17077/DRIVINGASSESSMENT.1468