External vacuum therapy for erectile dysfunction: use and results.

作者: R. W. Lewis , R. Witherington

DOI: 10.1007/BF01275162

关键词: NephrologySurgeryClinical successMedicinePriapismErectile dysfunctionEtiologyInternal medicineIncidence (epidemiology)

摘要: This review assesses the continuing role of noninvasive vacuum therapy as treatment for erectile dysfunction and discusses action negative pressure in producing assisted erection. Though recent research this area has centered on development pharmaceutical therapies, vacuum-therapy programs appear to be a consistent long-term option patients experiencing either chronic or occasional impotence any etiology. Very little testing is required before initiation treatment, overall clinical success rate approximately 90%. Significant been reported more difficult patient populations, including those with veno-occlusive disorders explanted penile prostheses. Vacuum may also used conjunction other therapies enhance results. Contraindications use are few primarily include unexplained intermittent priapism bleeding disorders. Side effects such numbness, pain, bruising, petechiae have low incidence. A recently survey 5, 847 users showed that 83.5% continue device intercourse desired. Patients should receive individual instruction these devices expect learning practice period achieve optimal As newer treatments gain increasing attention, it kept mind nearly every showing degree duration well who failed therapeutic choices candidates therapy.

参考文章(21)
Abraham Ami Sidi, Edgardo F. Becher, Gang Zhang, Jean H. Lewis, Patient Acceptance of and Satisfaction with an External Negative Pressure Device for Impotence Journal of Urology. ,vol. 144, pp. 1154- 1156 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39679-9
J.L. Marmar, T.J. Debenedictis, D.E. Praiss, The Use of a Vacuum Constrictor Device to Augment a Partial Erection Following an Intracavernous Injection The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 140, pp. 975- 979 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)41903-3
Jay H. Kim, Culley C. Carson, Development of Peyronie’s Disease with the Use of a Vacuum Constriction Device The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 149, pp. 1314- 1315 ,(1993) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36378-4
Juza Chen, Michael F. Godschalk, P. Gary Katz, Thomas Mulligan, Combining Intracavernous Injection and External Vacuum as Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 153, pp. 1476- 1477 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67437-8
J. E. Gould, D. M. Switters, G. A. Broderick, R. W. deVere White, External vacuum devices: a clinical comparison with pharmacologic erections World Journal of Urology. ,vol. 10, pp. 68- 70 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00186095
Louisa A. Turner, Stanley E. Althof, Stephen B. Levine, Donald R. Bodner, Elroy D. Kursh, Martin I. Resnick, External Vacuum Devices in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A One-Year Study of Sexual and Psychosocial Impact Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. ,vol. 17, pp. 81- 93 ,(1991) , 10.1080/00926239108404950
Perry W. Nadig, J. Catesby Ware, Ronald Blumoff, Noninvasive device to produce and maintain an erection-like state. Urology. ,vol. 27, pp. 126- 131 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90368-7
Louisa A. Turner, Stanley E. Althof, Stephen B. Levine, Donald R. Bodner, Elroy D. Kursh, Martin I. Resnick, Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self-injection versus external vacuum devices Urology. ,vol. 39, pp. 139- 144 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0090-4295(92)90270-7
Richard Villeneuve, Jacques Corcos, Michel Carmel, Assisted Erection Follow-up with Couples Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. ,vol. 17, pp. 94- 100 ,(1991) , 10.1080/00926239108404951
Clyde E. Blackard, William D. Borkon, Janet Swenson Lima, Joe Nelson, Use of vacuum tumescence device for impotence secondary to venous leakage Urology. ,vol. 41, pp. 225- 230 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90561-N