Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.

作者: James D. Brooks , Louis R. Kavoussi , Glenn M. Preminger , William W. Schuessler , Robert G. Moore

DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80345-8

关键词: Percutaneous endopyelotomyOpen pyeloplastyLaparoscopic pyeloplastyUreteropelvic junctionLaparoscopyPyeloplastySurgeryMedicineEndoscopyAdult patients

摘要: Abstract Objectives To compare open pyeloplasty with three minimally invasive modalities: antegrade endopyelotomy, Acucise endopyelotomy (Applied Medical, Laguna Hills, Calif), and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Methods Forty-five adult patients ureteropelvic junction obstruction were managed by one of the above four techniques. Success rates, analgesic use, length hospital stay, recovery time, complications compared between each groups. Results Successful relief was achieved in 100% undergoing dismembered pyeloplasty, 78% 77% percutaneous endopyelotomy. results shorter convalescence (1 week) than (4.7 weeks), (2.3 weeks) or (10.3 weeks). Complication rates appear to be similar among all Conclusions Our limited data imply that offers low morbidity success comparable whereas is as effective diminished morbidity.

参考文章(15)
Anita N. Cassis, George E. Brannen, William H. Bush, Roy J. Correa, Michael Chambers, Endopyelotomy: Review of Results and Complications The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 146, pp. 1492- 1495 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38147-8
William W. Schuessler, Martin T. Grune, Leopoldo V. Tecuanhuey, Glenn M. Preminger, Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 150, pp. 1795- 1799 ,(1993) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35898-6
Paul J. Van Cangh, Jean L. Jorion, Francois X. Wese, Reinier J. Opsomer, Endoureteropyelotomy: Percutaneous Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 141, pp. 1317- 1321 ,(1989) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)41293-6
S.D. CHOWDHURY, J. KENOGBON, Rigid Ureteroscopic Endopyelotomy without External Drainage Journal of Endourology. ,vol. 6, pp. 357- 360 ,(1992) , 10.1089/END.1992.6.357
A. Martelli, P. Buli, S. Spatafora, S. Grossi, Endourologic procedures for ureteropeluicjunction stenosis: Techniques and results Urology. ,vol. 36, pp. 47- 51 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0090-4295(90)80312-B
Franklin C. Lowe, Fray F. Marshall, Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults Urology. ,vol. 23, pp. 331- 335 ,(1984) , 10.1016/0090-4295(84)90133-X
PARAMJIT S. CHANDHOKE, RALPH V. CLAYMAN, A. MARIKA STONE, ELSPETH M. McDOUGALL, TERRY BUELNA, NABIL HILAL, MAGGIE CHANG, MARY JO STEGWELL, Endopyelotomy and endoureterotomy with the acucise ureteral cutting balloon device: preliminary experience. Journal of Endourology. ,vol. 7, pp. 45- 51 ,(1993) , 10.1089/END.1993.7.45
J. W. A. RAMSAY, R. A. MILLER, M. J. KELLETT, H. N. BLACKFORD, J. E. A. WICKHAM, H. N. WHITFIELD, Percutaneous pyelolysis: indications, complications and results. BJUI. ,vol. 56, pp. 586- 588 ,(1984) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.1984.TB06122.X
Peter T. Scardino, Peter L. Scardino, Obstruction at the Ureteropelvic Junction Springer, New York, NY. pp. 697- 716 ,(1981) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-5907-7_36
Irit Meretyk, Shimon Meretyk, Ralph V. Clayman, Endopyelotomy: comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 148, pp. 775- 782 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36717-4