Expenditures and Effort Associated With Recovery of Breeding Atlantic Coast Piping Plovers

作者: Anne Hecht , Scott M. Melvin

DOI: 10.2193/2008-061

关键词: Endangered speciesWildlifePopulationWildlife conservationEnvironmental protectionGeographyPloverThreatened speciesCharadriusRecreation

摘要: We calculated expenditures and hours of staff volunteer time dedicated to monitoring managing the United States breeding population Atlantic Coast piping plovers (Charadrius melodus) in 1993 2002 considered implications for recovery this management-dependent species. In 2002, 73 federal, state, local governmental agencies private organizations played key roles conservation efforts at 281 plover sites. Total inflation-adjusted estimated increased by 51% between from US$2.28 million $3.44 million, but annual per-pair declined 4% $2,459 $2,350, paid-staff effort were similar (93 hr/pair 1993, 95 hr 2002). Expenditures on-site management greater than 6 other categories expenses both years 42% 59% total costs 2002. Staff higher sites where more labor-intensive protect recreation human use necessitated accessibility. modest compared those some threatened endangered species large beach-stabilization projects. Our results provide a baseline estimating future protection, including development implementation long-term agreements that will be required remove Endangered Species Act protection. Impediments reducing are species' widespread distribution low densities unrelenting threats posed activities predators. Modest economies scale may achieved through arrangements span multiple landowners include at-risk beach

参考文章(12)
Scott M. Melvin, Laurie H. Macivor, Curtice R. Griffin, PREDATOR EXCLOSURES: A TECHNIQUE TO REDUCE PREDATION AT PIPING PLOVER NESTS Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 20, ,(1992)
Robert K. Murphy, Mark Russell Ryan, Mark Russell Ryan, Mark Russell Ryan, Michael A. Larson, Assessing recovery feasibility for piping plovers using optimization and simulation Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 31, pp. 1105- 1116 ,(2003)
Charles C. Mann, Mark L. Plummer, Noah's Choice: The Future of Endangered Species ,(1995)
Anne Hecht, Scott M. Melvin, Population Trends of Atlantic Coast Piping Plovers, 1986–2006 Waterbirds. ,vol. 32, pp. 64- 72 ,(2009) , 10.1675/063.032.0107
Scott M. Melvin, Curtice R. Griffin, Laurie H. Macivor, Recovery strategies for piping plovers in managed coastal landscapes Coastal Management. ,vol. 19, pp. 21- 34 ,(1991) , 10.1080/08920759109362129
David S. Wilcove, Linus Y. Chen, Management costs for endangered species Conservation Biology. ,vol. 12, pp. 1405- 1407 ,(1998) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.1998.97451.X
JULIE K. MILLER, J. MICHAEL SCOTT, CRAIG R. MILLER, LISETTE P. WAITS, The Endangered Species Act: Dollars and Sense? BioScience. ,vol. 52, pp. 163- 168 ,(2002) , 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0163:TESADA]2.0.CO;2
J Michael Scott, Dale D. Goble, John A. Wiens, David S. Wilcove, Michael Bean, Timothy Male, Recovery of imperiled species under the Endangered Species Act: the need for a new approach Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 3, pp. 383- 389 ,(2005) , 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0383:ROISUT]2.0.CO;2
Ruth Boettcher, Tom Penn, Robert R. Cross, Karen T. Terwilliger, Ruth A. Beck, An Overview of the Status and Distribution of Piping Plovers in Virginia Waterbirds. ,vol. 30, pp. 138- 151 ,(2007) , 10.1675/1524-4695(2007)030[0138:AOOTSA]2.0.CO;2