Property Appropriation and Economic Theory
作者： David P. Ellerman
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-585-26879-8_3
关键词: Property rights 、 Production (economics) 、 Economics 、 Value theory 、 Economic system 、 Structure (mathematical logic) 、 Value (economics) 、 Appropriation 、 Neoclassical economics 、 Property (philosophy) 、 Marxist philosophy
摘要: There is a major logical gap in neoclassical economic theory. This has not been revealed the debates between value theory and alternative theories such as neo-Ricardian, post-Keynesian, or Marxist theories. The reason simple; all these ignore mis-represent structure of property appropriation production. An ac-curate description rights obligations production requires new theory, but different type
springer.com
springerlink.com参考文章(43)
David P. Ellerman, Economics, accounting, and property theory ,(1982)
Paul A Samuelson, None, The Evaluation of ‘Social Income’: Capital Formation and Wealth Palgrave Macmillan, London. pp. 32- 57 ,(1961) , 10.1007/978-1-349-08452-4_3
Thomas Hodgskin, The Natural and Artificial Right of Property Contrasted ,(1973)
Kenneth Joseph Arrow, Frank. Hahn, General competitive analysis ,(1971)
Francis Raleigh Batt, The law of master and servant Sir Isaac Pitman. ,(1939)
James Mill, Elements of political economy ,(1944)
Edwin Burmeister, Synthesizing the neo-Austrian and alternative approaches to capital theory: a survey Journal of Economic Literature. ,vol. 12, pp. 413- 456 ,(1974)
Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom ,(1962)
G. David Garson, Gerry Hunnius, John Case, Workers' control;: A reader on labor and social change, ,(1973)
Kenneth J. Arrow, THE FIRM IN GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM THEORY Palgrave Macmillan, London. pp. 68- 110 ,(1969) , 10.1007/978-1-349-01110-0_3