Debate on the Appropriate Methods for Conducting Impact Evaluation of Programs within the Development Context

作者: Enyonam B. Norgbey

DOI:

关键词: Management scienceImpact evaluationProgram evaluationDevelopment (topology)Order (business)Computer scienceContext (language use)

摘要: Background: Donors and decision-makers use impact evaluation reports to assess the effectiveness of development programs identify ways improve design implementation projects, programs, policies in developing countries. Purpose: This paper will explore existing published literature on provide an overview types approaches methods that are being used conduct evaluations. Setting: NA Intervention: NA Research Design:  The examine program order shed light issues related appropriate for evaluations programs. Data Collection Analysis: Literature review. Findings: The conclude by suggesting a list can be within context.

参考文章(26)
Michael Quinn Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation ,(1978)
Michael Bamberger, Innovations in the use of mixed methods in real-world evaluation Journal of Development Effectiveness. ,vol. 7, pp. 317- 326 ,(2015) , 10.1080/19439342.2015.1068832
Nicoletta Stame, What Doesn’t Work? Three Failures, Many Answers: Evaluation. ,vol. 16, pp. 371- 387 ,(2010) , 10.1177/1356389010381914
Eva Broegaard, Ted Freeman, Carsten Schwensen, Experience from a phased mixed-methods approach to impact evaluation of Danida support to rural transport infrastructure in Nicaragua Journal of Development Effectiveness. ,vol. 3, pp. 9- 27 ,(2011) , 10.1080/19439342.2010.545893
Soniya Carvalho, Howard White, Theory-Based Evaluation: The Case of Social Funds. American Journal of Evaluation. ,vol. 25, pp. 141- 160 ,(2004) , 10.1177/109821400402500202
Jennifer C. Greene, The Generative Potential of Mixed Methods Inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. ,vol. 28, pp. 207- 211 ,(2005) , 10.1080/01406720500256293
Peter W. Airasian, Geoffrey E. Mills, Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application ,(1995)
Patricia J. Rogers, Matching impact evaluation design to the nature of the intervention and the purpose of the evaluation Journal of Development Effectiveness. ,vol. 1, pp. 217- 226 ,(2009) , 10.1080/19439340903114636
Chris L. S. Coryn, Lindsay A. Noakes, Carl D. Westine, Daniela C. Schröter, A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009 American Journal of Evaluation. ,vol. 32, pp. 199- 226 ,(2011) , 10.1177/1098214010389321