A welfare analysis of electricity transmission planning in Germany
作者： Claudia Kemfert , Friedrich Kunz , Juan Rosellón
DOI: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2016.04.011
关键词: Electricity market 、 Welfare 、 Economic model 、 Economic dispatch 、 Transmission (telecommunications) 、 Operations research 、 Network planning and design 、 Electricity 、 Market economy 、 Economics 、 Electric power transmission
摘要: We analyze the electricity transmission planning process in Germany (Netzentwicklungsplan), which separates expansion decisions from generation dispatch. employ an economic modeling approach to two different network settings. In first setting, there is no trade-off between development and dispatch, as currently case Germany. A second setting alternatively allows for such a trade-off, thus represents welfare superior way of planning. Applications with model variants are carried out German system 2035. The results illustrate overinvestment capacity decreased associated Netzentwicklungsplan.
socionet.ru参考文章(18)
Jens Weibezahn, Clemens Gerbaulet, Richard Ihlenburg, Friedrich Kunz, Benjamin Reinhard, Jonas Egerer, Christian von Hirschhausen, Alexander Weber, Electricity Sector Data for Policy-Relevant Modeling: Data Documentation and Applications to the German and European Electricity Markets Research Papers in Economics. ,(2014)
Katrin Trepper, Michael Bucksteeg, Christoph Weber, Market splitting in Germany – New evidence from a three-stage numerical model of Europe Energy Policy. ,vol. 87, pp. 199- 215 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2015.08.016
Veronika Grimm, Alexander Martin, Martin Schmidt, Martin Weibelzahl, Gregor Zöttl, Transmission and Generation Investment in Electricity Markets: The Effects of Market Splitting and Network Fee Regimes European Journal of Operational Research. ,vol. 254, pp. 493- 509 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.EJOR.2016.03.044
Masoud Jenabi, Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Fatemi Ghomi, Yves Smeers, Bi-Level Game Approaches for Coordination of Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning Within a Market Environment IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. ,vol. 28, pp. 2639- 2650 ,(2013) , 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2236110
Enzo E. Sauma, Shmuel S. Oren, Do generation firms in restructured electricity markets have incentives to support social-welfare-improving transmission investments? Energy Economics. ,vol. 31, pp. 676- 689 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ENECO.2009.01.015
Luis Baringo, Antonio J. Conejo, Transmission and Wind Power Investment IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. ,vol. 27, pp. 885- 893 ,(2012) , 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2170441
Adriaan Hendrik van der Weijde, Benjamin F. Hobbs, The economics of planning electricity transmission to accommodate renewables: Using two-stage optimisation to evaluate flexibility and the cost of disregarding uncertainty Energy Economics. ,vol. 34, pp. 2089- 2101 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.ENECO.2012.02.015
Andreas Schroeder, Pao-Yu Oei, Aram Sander, Lisa Hankel, Lilian Charlotte Laurisch, The integration of renewable energies into the German transmission grid—A scenario comparison Energy Policy. ,vol. 61, pp. 140- 150 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.06.006
Wolf-Peter Schill, Jonas Egerer, Juan Rosellón, Testing Regulatory Regimes for Power Transmission Expansion with Fluctuating Demand and Wind Generation Journal of Regulatory Economics. ,vol. 47, pp. 1- 28 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11149-014-9260-0
Juan Rosellón, Zdeňka Myslíková, Eric Zenón, Incentives for Transmission Investment in the PJM Electricity Market: FTRs or Regulation (or Both?) Utilities Policy. ,vol. 19, pp. 3- 13 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-1-4471-4787-9_15