Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: A survey among general practitioners

作者: Marjolein Lugtenberg , Jako S Burgers , Casper F Besters , Dolly Han , Gert P Westert

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-98

关键词: Guideline adherenceElectronic mailFamily medicineThyroid disorderDecision aidsNursingPatient preferenceCross-sectional studyMEDLINEMedicineGuideline

摘要: Background: Despite considerable efforts to promote and support guideline use, adherence is often suboptimal. Barriers vary not only across guidelines but also recommendations within guidelines. The aim of this study was assess the perceived barriers among GPs by focusing on key Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey 703 in Netherlands. Sixteen were derived from four national Six statements included address attitudes towards general. In addition, asked rate their (one statement) (fourteen statements) for each recommendations, based an existing framework. Results: 264 (38%) completed questionnaire. Although 35% reported difficulties changing routines habits follow guidelines, 89% believed that following leads improved patient care. Perceived varied between 52 95% (mean: 77%). most related external factors, particular ability behaviour 30%) preferences 23%). Lack applicability general 22%) more specifically individual patients 25%) frequently as barriers. scores differed largely [minimum range 14%; maximum 67%]. Conclusions: Dutch have positive attitude NHG report high rates low levels However, recommendations. are related, suggesting current do always adequately incorporate preferences, needs abilities. It may be useful provide tools such decision aids, supporting flexible use practice.

参考文章(33)
Cynthia M Farquhar, Emma W Kofa, Jean R Slutsky, Clinicians' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. The Medical Journal of Australia. ,vol. 177, pp. 502- 506 ,(2002) , 10.5694/J.1326-5377.2002.TB04920.X
Ken Gilhooly, Anne Walker, Liz Smith, Clinical guidelines of depression: a qualitative study of GPs' views. Journal of Family Practice. ,vol. 53, pp. 556- 561 ,(2004)
Murray Krahn, Gary Naglie, The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. ,vol. 300, pp. 436- 438 ,(2008) , 10.1001/JAMA.300.4.436
Selena Gray, Ian Harvey, Chris Watkins, Carole Langley, Alex Faulkner, General practitioners' use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them. British Journal of General Practice. ,vol. 49, pp. 11- 15 ,(1999)
Gert P. Westert, Richard Grol, Marjan J. Faber, Jako S. Burgers, Achieving high performance quality in primary healthcare: The Dutch example. International public health journal. ,vol. 3, pp. 441- 444 ,(2011)
J Grimshaw, N Freemantle, S Wallace, I Russell, B Hurwitz, I Watt, A Long, T Sheldon, Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. BMJ Quality & Safety. ,vol. 4, pp. 55- 64 ,(1995) , 10.1136/QSHC.4.1.55
Mike J Crawford, Deborah Rutter, Catherine Manley, Timothy Weaver, Kamaldeep Bhui, Naomi Fulop, Peter Tyrer, None, Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care BMJ. ,vol. 325, pp. 1263- 1263 ,(2002) , 10.1136/BMJ.325.7375.1263
Michael D. Cabana, Cynthia S. Rand, Neil R. Powe, Albert W. Wu, Modena H. Wilson, Paul-André C. Abboud, Haya R. Rubin, Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement JAMA. ,vol. 282, pp. 1458- 1465 ,(1999) , 10.1001/JAMA.282.15.1458