Interrater Reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale

作者: L. B. Goldstein , C. Bertels , J. N. Davis

DOI: 10.1001/ARCHNEUR.1989.00520420080026

关键词:

摘要: • The interobserver reliability of a rating scale employed in several multicenter stroke trials was investigated. Twenty patients who had were rated with this by four clinical fellows. Each patient independently evaluated one pair observers. degree interrater agreement for each item on the determined calculation k statistic. Interobserver moderate to substantial 9 13 items. This system compares favorably other scales which such comparisons can be made. However, validity must established.

参考文章(19)
Jääskö L, Leyman I, Steglind S, Olsson S, Fugl-Meyer Ar, The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. ,vol. 7, pp. 13- 31 ,(1975)
Harold Goodglass, Edith Kaplan, The assessment of aphasia and related disorders ,(1972)
Joseph L. Fleiss, Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 76, pp. 378- 382 ,(1971) , 10.1037/H0031619
Michael S Kramer, Alvan R Feinstein, Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. ,vol. 29, pp. 111- 123 ,(1981) , 10.1038/CLPT.1981.18
R Côté, V C Hachinski, B L Shurvell, J W Norris, C Wolfson, The Canadian Neurological Scale: a preliminary study in acute stroke. Stroke. ,vol. 17, pp. 731- 737 ,(1986) , 10.1161/01.STR.17.4.731
NinanT Mathew, VictorM Rivera, JohnStirling Meyer, JonathanZ Charney, Alexander Hartmann, DOUBLE-BLIND EVALUATION OF GLYCEROL THERAPY IN ACUTE CEREBRAL INFARCTION The Lancet. ,vol. 300, pp. 1327- 1329 ,(1972) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(72)92775-4
J D Spence, A Donner, Problems in design of stroke treatment trials. Stroke. ,vol. 13, pp. 94- 99 ,(1982) , 10.1161/01.STR.13.1.94
K Asplund, Clinimetrics in stroke research. Stroke. ,vol. 18, pp. 528- 530 ,(1987) , 10.1161/01.STR.18.2.528
Jacob Cohen, A Coefficient of agreement for nominal Scales Educational and Psychological Measurement. ,vol. 20, pp. 37- 46 ,(1960) , 10.1177/001316446002000104