Age Differences in Experience and Regulation of Affect

作者: Pär Bjälkebring

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Bjalkebring, P. (2014). Age Differences in Experience and Regulation of Affect. Department Psychology, University Gothenburg, Sweden The overall aim the thesis is to investigate differences how younger older adults view control affect. Study I II participants their happiness what factors influence perception happiness. In we found weak negative association between age addition, a both positive Younger anticipated higher levels compared current happiness, while rated past as than results indicate that people are likely believe changes over lifespan. an experiment was conducted elaborate on finding have more future with adults. analyses show difference wording influenced ratings differently for suggest prefer low arousal high, which preferred ages. III investigated occurrence regret, well regret regulation context everyday life decision-making. Using webbased diary method, daily decisions were sampled eight days. reported experienced Although strategies used by all groups, often reduce intensity regret. lower adults, can be accounted for, at least part, prevention other strategies. IV charitable giving two experiments. We support age-related positivity bias monetary donations. This true motivation make donation, affective thinking about previous donation. concluded draw affect from planning outcome donations hence benefit engaging charity counterparts. Together, these studies there systematic perceive regulate due various uses active emotion Older seem compensate related decline deliberate processes, makes it possible maintain well-being old age.

参考文章(102)
Stuart W. Quirk, Thomas H. Carr, Richard E. Lucas, Michael Hoerger, Cognitive Determinants of Affective Forecasting Errors Judgment and Decision Making. ,vol. 5, pp. 365- 373 ,(2010)
David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, Auke Tellegen, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 54, pp. 1063- 1070 ,(1988) , 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Ziva Kunda, The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 108, pp. 480- 498 ,(1990) , 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Laura L. Carstensen, Evidence for a Life-Span Theory of Socioemotional Selectivity Current Directions in Psychological Science. ,vol. 4, pp. 151- 156 ,(1995) , 10.1111/1467-8721.EP11512261
James J. Gross, Oliver P. John, Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 85, pp. 348- 362 ,(2003) , 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
Ellen Peters, Thomas M. Hess, Daniel Västfjäll, Corinne Auman, Adult Age Differences in Dual Information Processes Implications for the Role of Affective and Deliberative Processes in Older Adults' Decision Making Perspectives on Psychological Science. ,vol. 2, pp. 1- 23 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1745-6916.2007.00025.X
Eldar Shafir, Itamar Simonson, Amos Tversky, Reason-based choice Cognition. ,vol. 49, pp. 11- 36 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90034-S
Denise R. Beike, Keith D. Markman, Figen Karadogan, What We Regret Most Are Lost Opportunities: A Theory of Regret Intensity Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. ,vol. 35, pp. 385- 397 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0146167208328329
Timothy D. Wilson, Daniel T. Gilbert, Affective Forecasting Knowing What to Want Current Directions in Psychological Science. ,vol. 14, pp. 131- 134 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.0963-7214.2005.00355.X