The nature of philosophy and the philosophy of nature

作者: Tim Lewens

DOI: 10.1007/S10539-015-9485-Z

关键词:

摘要: Peter Godfrey-Smith’s introduction to the philosophy of biology is excellent. This review questions one implication his book, namely that Darwin’s case for efficacy natural selection was hampered by ignorance particulate nature inheritance. I suggest, instead, Darwin handicapped an inability effectively engage in quantitative population thinking. also question understanding role Malthusian struggle plays linking origination new adaptive traits, and raise problems defence apparently unproblematic conceptions human nature. Finally, highlight welcome conception a ‘philosophy nature’ developed Godfrey-Smith.

参考文章(15)
Robert Olby, Mendel No Mendelian History of Science. ,vol. 17, pp. 53- 72 ,(1979) , 10.1177/007327537901700103
Peter J. Vorzimmer, Charles Darwin and Blending Inheritance Isis. ,vol. 54, pp. 371- 390 ,(1963) , 10.1086/349734
Karen Neander, Pruning the Tree of Life The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. ,vol. 46, pp. 59- 80 ,(1995) , 10.1093/BJPS/46.1.59
Gregory Radick, The professor and the pea: Lives and afterlives of William Bateson’s campaign for the utility of Mendelism Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. ,vol. 44, pp. 280- 291 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.SHPSA.2012.11.009
Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection ,(1930)
Gregory Radick, Physics in the Galtonian sciences of heredity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. ,vol. 42, pp. 129- 138 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.SHPSC.2010.11.019
ALAN R. RUSHTON, William Bateson and the chromosome theory of heredity: a reappraisal The British Journal for the History of Science. ,vol. 47, pp. 147- 171 ,(2014) , 10.1017/S0007087413000320
Tim Lewens, Natural selection then and now. Biological Reviews. ,vol. 85, pp. 829- 835 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1469-185X.2010.00128.X