A Comparison of Neural Networks and Model Updating Methods for Damage Localization

作者: A Garcia-Gonzalez , A Gonzalez-Herrera , JF Velasco , A Garcia-Cerezo , JM Diaz Santiago

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: In this paper a comparison between classical Model Updating methods and Neuronal Network for damage localization is presented. Both are based in modal parameters have been applied to the same experimental problem. The main objective of research establish comparatives qualities each method. consolidated method detection, but it long process that requires considerable computational cost. Artificial Networks (ANN) faster consequently they require less cost if neural network properly chosen trained. A laboratory test beam supported four points has developed order apply Finite Element Update detection. first step made by means Iterative Methods. second small introduced with both Neural methods. full numerical model update developed. Guyan reduction Independence Effective used select best transducers position. Correlation, validation adaptation data techniques used. are: reduction, Dynamic Improved Reduction System (IRS) SEREP reduction. correlation Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC), Coordinate (COMAC) Modified (MACMO). Also parameterization, sensibility analyses done before final updating. Different penalty functions depending number update. ANNs trained results obtained simulations Method. These introducing different beam. Ones ANN trained, evaluated as tool predict position natural frequencies Paper 49

参考文章(16)
Fabrizio Vestroni, Structural Identification Parametric Models and Idefem Code Dynamic Methods for Damage Detection in Structures. pp. 95- 109 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-3-211-78777-9_4
Rene B. Testa, Characteristics and Detection of Damage and Fatigue Cracks Dynamic Methods for Damage Detection in Structures. pp. 183- 193 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-3-211-78777-9_7
Fabrizio Vestroni, Annamaria Pau, Elements of Experimental Modal Analysis Dynamic Methods for Damage Detection in Structures. pp. 1- 12 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-3-211-78777-9_1
Antonino Morassi, Damage Detection in Vibrating Beams Dynamic Methods for Damage Detection in Structures. pp. 137- 182 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-3-211-78777-9_6
X. Wu, J. Ghaboussi, J.H. Garrett, Use of neural networks in detection of structural damage Computers & Structures. ,vol. 42, pp. 649- 659 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0045-7949(92)90132-J
M.I. Friswell, S.D. Garvey, J.E.T. Penny, THE CONVERGENCE OF THE ITERATED IRS METHOD Journal of Sound and Vibration. ,vol. 211, pp. 123- 132 ,(1998) , 10.1006/JSVI.1997.1368
J. E. T. Penny, M. I. Friswell, S. D. Garvey, Automatic choice of measurement locations for dynamic testing AIAA Journal. ,vol. 32, pp. 407- 414 ,(1994) , 10.2514/3.11998
M.I. Friswell, S.D. Garvey, J.E.T. Penny, Model reduction using dynamic and iterated IRS techniques Journal of Sound and Vibration. ,vol. 186, pp. 311- 323 ,(1995) , 10.1006/JSVI.1995.0451
Oliver Richard de Lautour, Piotr Omenzetter, Prediction of seismic-induced structural damage using artificial neural networks Engineering Structures. ,vol. 31, pp. 600- 606 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2008.11.010
M. I. Friswell, D. J. Inman, D. F. Pilkey, Direct Updating of Damping and Stiffness Matrices AIAA Journal. ,vol. 36, pp. 491- 493 ,(1998) , 10.2514/2.396