Soil Quality Criteria for Environmental Pollutants

作者: M.D.F. Rodríguez , J.V.T. Lafarga

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52272-6.00632-2

关键词:

摘要: The assessment of soil quality regarding chemical pollution has been mainly covered through the development standards (SQSs). quality, measured in terms level or degree contamination, is assessed by comparing concentration relevant pollutants and threshold values established for each group chemicals. SQSs are nowadays developed using adapted risk methodologies. process includes three main components: exposure assessment, effects characterization. determines different potentially exposed organisms, named as ‘the receptors,’ to chemicals concern all possible routes. environmental effect toxicological profile substance a set selected organisms representing receptors, extrapolates information setting where concentrations not expected produce adverse effects. Usually, characterization final phase process, data from assessments compared determine actual organisms. For setting, applied way, it used determining (soil concentration) associated with preestablished risk, instead risk. Currently, criteria targeted including biological tools together substance-specific SQSs. Thus, toxicity assays performed samples taken site biomonitoring combined analyses This article presents protection ecosystems use complementary method assessing quality.

参考文章(9)
K Hund-Rinke, W Kördel, Underlying issues in bioaccessibility and bioavailability: experimental methods. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. ,vol. 56, pp. 52- 62 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0147-6513(03)00050-2
Joanna S. Jaworska, Theo P. Traas, Tom Aldenberg, Normal Species Sensitivity Distributions and Probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment CRC Press. pp. 73- 126 ,(2001) , 10.1201/9781420032314-9
O. H. J. Szolar, A. P. Loibner, R. Braun, D. Hirmann, K. C. Thompson, C. P. . Nathanail, Ecological assessment and toxicity screening in contaminated land analysis. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 229- 267 ,(2003)
Anton M. Breure, Jörg Römbke, The ecological classification and assessment of soils Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. ,vol. 62, pp. 185- 186 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.ECOENV.2005.03.022
María Dolores Fernández, Ekain Cagigal, María Milagrosa Vega, Arantzazu Urzelai, Mar Babín, Javier Pro, José Vicente Tarazona, Ecological risk assessment of contaminated soils through direct toxicity assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. ,vol. 62, pp. 174- 184 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.ECOENV.2004.11.013
Thomas Knacker, Cornelis A.M. van Gestel, Susan E. Jones, Amadeu M.V.M. Soares, Hans-Joachim Schallnaß, Bernhard Förster, Clive A. Edwards, Ring-Testing and Field-Validation of a Terrestrial Model Ecosystem (TME) – An Instrument for Testing Potentially Harmful Substances: Conceptual Approach and Study Design Ecotoxicology. ,vol. 13, pp. 9- 27 ,(2004) , 10.1023/B:ECTX.0000012402.38786.01
J. Struijs, D. van de Meent, W.J.G.M. Peijnenburg, M.A.G.T. van den Hoop, T. Crommentuijn, Added Risk Approach to Derive Maximum Permissible Concentrations for Heavy Metals: How to Take Natural Background Levels into Account Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. ,vol. 37, pp. 112- 118 ,(1997) , 10.1006/EESA.1997.1534
C.J. Keddy, J.C. Greene, M.A. Bonnell, Review of whole-organism bioassays: soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater assessment in Canada. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. ,vol. 30, pp. 221- 251 ,(1995) , 10.1006/EESA.1995.1027
Frank A. Swartjes, Claudio Carlon, Niek H.S.M. de Wit, The possibilities for the EU-wide use of similar ecological risk-based soil contamination assessment tools. Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 406, pp. 523- 529 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2008.07.034